Growth patterns of infants aged 0 to 24 months in China: a multicentre prospective birth cohort study across China

Fengxiu Ouyang,Fan Jiang,Fangbiao Tao,Shunqing Xu,Yankai Xia,Xiu Qiu,Jun Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32632-1
IF: 202.731
2018-01-01
The Lancet
Abstract:Abstract Background Assessment of a childu0027s growth is important for detecting aberrations, whether too much or too little or growth. Poor growth in early life may have long-lasting programming effects on later non-communicable diseases. We examined the growth patterns of healthy Chinese infants from birth to 24 months to provide a baseline from which to detect cases of too much or too little growth. Methods This study was based on six birth cohorts from across China in 2015, which provided data on 4251 infants (2174 boys, 2077 girls) who were born at term to mothers without gestational or preexisting diabetes, chronic hypertension, preeclampsia, or eclampsia. Analyses were performed using 28 298 longitudinal anthropometric measurements in 4251 infants and the LMS method, and smoothed Z-score growth curves were generated. These standards based on Chinese children were compared to WHO growth standards (which are based on data from 2003) and current Chinese growth references (which are based on data from 2005). The six birth cohorts were located in Shanghai (2 cohorts), Anhui, Guangdong, Hubei, and Jiangsu Provinces. Pregnant women were recruited at hospitals when they came for their routine prenatal care visits. Each cohort contributed longitudinal child growth data of 1000 single infants from birth to 24 months, or the maximum number available at the time of our data request in July, 2016 (261–1065). Infant anthropometric measurements were taken seven times (at 42 days, 3, 6, 8 [or 9], 12, 18 and 24 months). This project was approved by the institutional review board of Xinhua Hospital, affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (approval number XHEC-C-2017-060). Findings Compared to the WHO longitudinal growth standards for children aged 0 to 2 years, the growth standards from this longitudinal study (length, weight, head circumference, BMI-for-age, and weight-for-length) were significantly higher, for both boys and girls. For example, in comparison with the corresponding WHO growth standard, the median length-for-age was on average 0·9 cm (range 0·2–1·3 cm) higher in Chinese boys and 1·3 cm (range 0·5–1·9 cm) higher in Chinese girls. growth references from this study were also higher than the current China cross-sectional growth references (based on data from a decade ago), but the difference was less than that between growth standards of this study and WHO growth standards. Compared to the China growth reference (data from 2005), the median length-for-age in our study (data from 2015) was on average 0·3 cm higher in boys, and 0·5 cm higher in girls across. Interpretation Growth curves of healthy Chinese infants evaluated longitudinally from 0 to 24 months of age provide standards for monitoring growth in early life in China that are more recent than WHO longitudinal growth standards and the current cross-sectional growth references for China. Funding This work was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Healthy Birth, Growth u0026 Development knowledge integration (HBGDki) project (number OPP1153191).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?