Abstract:Information revelation has become increasingly popular among name-your-own-price (NYOP) providers as a strategy to influence buyers' behavior and facilitate the transaction success rate in industrial practice. However, the mechanism underlying how disclosed information affects a bidder's decision-making process, as well as the consequent bidding results, remains unknown. In this study, we adopted an adapted dynamic choice model to simulate the bidders' decision process, which led to our proposal of a novel mechanism to explain how specific price information affects bidders' willingness to pay, expectation on threshold price and haggling willingness. The relationship model was then tested using real transaction data from the Shanghai Steel Transaction Center, one of the biggest steel spot transaction platforms in China that employs the NYOP pricing system. Our empirical results showed that a bidder's haggling behavior can be influenced by both personal transaction experience and revealed environmental information; therefore, sellers who intend to hinder haggling behavior can choose to reveal list price information that is more consistent with their bidders' internal reference price. Interestingly, we also found that haggling behavior may not always be harmful because it can enhance the bidders' net utility under certain conditions. Analysis of the combined effects on customer behavior—when more than one kind of relevant price information is disclosed—showed that additional market condition information (i.e., market price fluctuation) has a moderating effect on how current revealed list price information influences a bidder's decision. Thus, by very slightly increasing threshold price, sellers can facilitate haggling in order to increase customer utility in a volatile market. In summary, our study investigated an approach to understand a customer's behavior under different price information environments in the NYOP context. The results indicate that platform providers can implement various information revelation strategies to facilitate dynamic adjustment in the threshold price by sellers to maximize their profits.

How Does Analyst Forecast Dispersion Affect SEO Discounts in Uniform-Price Auction System? Evidence from Investor Bids in China

Are SEO investors misled by analyst optimism bias? Evidence from investor bids in SEO auctions

Games for Attention: Evidence from Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts for U.S.-Listed Foreign Firms

A Contingency Model of Bidding Strategies in Online Auctions in China.

The Dispersion of Beta Estimates and the Investors’ Heterogeneous Beliefs：Evidence from the Stock Market in China

Uniform price auctions with pre-announced revenue targets: Evidence from China's SEOs

Does air pollution affect seasoned equity offering pricing? Evidence from investor bids

Stock hyping before auction-style SEOs: Are primary market investors misled?

Can Bidder’s Buying Patterns Affect the Price in Online Auctions for Heterogeneous Goods?

Sunshine-induced Mood and SEO Pricing: Evidence from Detailed Investor Bids in SEO Auctions

R&D manipulation and SEO pricing in the Chinese capital market: The information effect of inefficient investment

Influence of Media Coverage and Sentiment on Seasoned Equity Offerings.

An Analysis of Starting Price in English Online Auctions

Information Revelation and Customer Decision-Making Process of Repeat-Bidding Name-Your-own-price Auction

Does Environmental Regulation Affect Analyst Forecast Bias? Evidence from China’s Low-Carbon Pilot Policy

Ordered Search, Intraplatform Competition and an Invisible Market Boundary — Evidence from Chinese E-commerce Platforms

The Analysis of Reputation and Network Externalities of Price Dispersion in On-Line Market

Design Information Disclosure under Bidder Heterogeneity in Online Advertising Auctions: Implications of Bid-Adherence Behavior

Information Asymmetry and the Listed Companies' SEO Preference

SEO Pricing with Marketability Restriction - A Monte Carlo Method with Stochastic Return and Volatility

Information Risk and Underwriter Switching in Seos: Evidence from China