What is the role of sexually transmitted disease clinics?
M. Golden,P. Kerndt
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000271
2015-05-01
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Abstract:Approximately 5 years ago, we wrote an editorial in Sexually Transmitted Diseases arguing that the United States needs to sustain its network of sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics. At that time, the economic situation in the country was dire, and many health departments were closing STD clinics in the face of substantial budget deficits. Although health care reform was being hotly debated, congress had not yet passed the Affordable Care Act (ACA). A lot has changed since then. The economy is now growing, unemployment is declining, and overall state government spending is increasing. The extent to which this change has slowed or halted the trend toward health departments decreasing their direct provision of STD care is uncertain. The largest contributor to the rebound in state health care budgets is enactment of the ACA and the associated expansion ofMedicaid, the program that supports health care for low-income Americans. The ACA has increased the proportion of nonelderly adults with health insurance, but that effect has been uneven, in part due to the decision by 22 states not to expand Medicaid. In the first year after full adoption of the ACA, the number of uninsured persons in states that have expanded Medicaid has declined almost 40% compared with less than 10% in states that have not expanded eligibility for the program. Of note, 11 (65%) of 17 southern states (including the District of Columbia) have yet to expand Medicaid, compared with 11 (32%) of 34 states in other parts of the United States. Thus, legislation designed to diminish economic disparities in access to care is likely to increase geographical disparities, at least in the near term. Persons in the southern United States, the area where STD rates are generally highest, less often have health insurance than persons in other parts of the country, and the disparate adoption of Medicaid expansion has the potential to exacerbate that difference. The epidemiology of HIV/STD and our approach to disease control has also changed. At long last, many parts of the United States are reporting declines in newHIV diagnoses. However, that success seems to be inconsistent. Not all areas are observing declines among men who have sex with men (MSM), and HIVappears to be replicating the US experiencewith other STDs, growingmore concentrated among African Americans, particularly African AmericanMSM in the south.Meanwhile, our response to HIV increasingly mirrors our approach to other STDs, emphasizing biomedical interventions: condoms, widespread and frequent HIV testing, treatment of infected persons, and preexposureprophylaxis. Within this changing context, revisiting the role of STD clinics in the nation's HIV/STD control infrastructure is timely. In this issue of the journal, Pathela and colleagues from the Sexually Transmitted Diseases Surveillance Network (SSuN) present data characterizing the patients seen in 40 STD clinics in 12 US areas. The clinics included in the study are heterogeneous. Some are highly specialized STD clinics, whereas others are really venues that serve a wider clinical function that includes STD care. The extent to which the clinics are representative of US STD clinics is uncertain, only 3 SSuN sites are in the southern United States, and some very large states (e.g., Texas and Florida) do not participate in the project, a significant limitation to the network that may be worth addressing in the future. Despite that, the existence of SSuN represents progress and is a useful source of information. Two findings stand out. First, STD clinics provide care to populations that are underserved, and these clinics play a critical role in addressing racial disparities in health. The patients seen in STD clinics are disproportionately male and minority. Indeed, more than half of all patients seen in the clinics included in the study were African American, and in 4 areas more than 80% of patients were African American. Sexually transmitted diseases are among the most glaring examples of a racial disparity in health. Clearly, the existence of these clinics has not resolved the problem of racial disparities, but imagine how bad that problem might be in the absence of this dedicated infrastructure. Although SSuN did not report data on what proportion of STD clinic patients had health insurance, studies undertaken before enactment of Medicaid expansion in New York and San Francisco found that more than half of STD