Clinical Benefit of Continuing Apatinib Beyond Progression in Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer.

Shukui Qin,Lu Wen,Junsheng Wang,Wenying Deng,Guifang Zhang,Tongfu Jia,Yi Ba,Haijun Zhong,Jianwei Yang,Xiaoyan Lin,Yu-Xian Bai,Yifu He,Zhong Xie,Tienan Yi,Xiangyuan Wu,Feng Ye,Likun Liu,Yong Huang,Mei Wang,Jin Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.e16020
IF: 45.3
2018-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:e16020 Background: Apatinib has been approved in China for patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic gastric and gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma after at least two lines of systemic chemotherapy. This indication is being evaluated worldwide. However, there is limited option for fourth- or later-line treatment for pts with gastric cancer. Herein, we aimed to assess whether pts could still benefit from continuing apatinib treatment after failure of apatinib as third-line or beyond therapy. Methods: Data were collected from a post-marketing Phase IV study (Ahead-G201) in China, in which pts were planned to receive apatinib until disease progression, death or unacceptable toxicity. Pts who had radiographic or clinical progression were included in the present analysis. Results: As of 12/21/2017, 1229 pts enrolled in the Ahead-G201 study were evaluable for efficacy. Following the scheduled apatinib treatment, there were 336 pts with radiographic progression and 82 pts with clinical progression. Among them, 60 (14.4%) pts chose to continue apatinib monotherapy or in combination with other systemic treatment (defined as apatinib continued group), whereas 358 (85.6%) pts received treatment other than apatinib (defined as no apatinib group). There was no significant difference between the two groups in baseline characteristics, including age, gender, ECOG PS and treatment lines. Compared with no apatinib group, apatinib continued group showed a significantly longer overall survival (OS) (8.84 [95%CI, 7.29–11.89) vs. 6.47 [95%CI, 5.59–7.06] months; p= 0.0270). Radiographic data were only available for 40 pts in the apatinib continued group. No pts achieved complete or partial response. The disease control rate was 42.5%. The median progression-free survival was 1.91 (95%CI, 1.68–2.83) months. Conclusions: For cases with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer who received apatinib as third- or later-line treatment, continuing apatinib monotherapy or in combination with other drugs beyond initial progression still bring survival benefit. This analysis provides evidence for further clinical trials. Clinical trial information: NCT02426034.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?