Apatinib In Patients With Adenocarcinoma Of Stomach Or Gastroesophageal Junction: A Prospective, Multicenter, Non-Interventional Study (Ahead-G202)

Chunmei Bai,Diansheng Zhong,Xiubao Ren,Ruixing Zhang,Likun Liu,Nan Du,Mudan Yang,Junyan Yu,Zhanzhao Fu,Aimin Zang,Junping Zhang,Jianfeng Diao,Yuchuan Ren,Jinghua Gao,Huaqing Wang,Jun Guo,Lei Zhang,Liwen Ma,Junmei Jia,Guozhong Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.e16047
IF: 45.3
2018-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:e16047 Background: This study observed the efficacy and safety of apatinib in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma, helping elucidate the optimal initial dose in the real world with wider inclusion criteria. Methods: This trial enrolled patients(pts) from 32 centers in China who had disease progression after at least two lines of systemic chemotherapy, or pts who were considered to be benefit from the treatment. Pts received oral apatinib 500 mg once daily, and dose could be adjusted according to the pts’ physical condition and the doctors’ experience. The tumor response was determined according to RECIST 1.1 criteria; the adverse events (AEs) were graded using CTCAE version 4.0. Results: Between Mar 2015 and Dec 2017, 391 pts were identified to have received apatinib. The median age was 62 years and the ratio of male to female was about 2:1(266:125). Among the eligible pts, 145 received apatinib at an initial dose of 250 mg (Group A), 228 received at the dose of 425-500 mg (Group B), and only 18 received at the dose of 750-850 mg (Group C). There were 272 pts received survival analysis and 186 among them received efficacy evaluation. 15 pts had partial response (PR) and 124 pts had disease stability (SD), achieving an ORR of 8.1% and a DCR of 74.7%. The mPFS and mOS were 3.5 months and 6.8 months respectively. 98 pts in Group A and 157 pts in Group B received survival analysis, and there was no difference in age, gender, ECOG and treatment line. Although there was no significant difference between the mPFS of group A and group B (3.0 vs 3.9 months; p = 0.15), Group B presented a prolongation of mOS compared to group A (7.1 vs 5.8 months; p = 0.04). All the 391 pts received safety analysis. Most common AEs were hypertension (43.3%), fatigue (31.8%), hand-foot skin reactions (18.6%), proteinuria (20.2%), diarrhea (8.4%) and bleeding (6.6%). The grade 3 to 4 AEs were hypertension (6.6%), hand-foot skin reactions (3.3%) and fatigue (3.0%). Conclusions: In the real world, pts were most likely given apatinib by the dose of 500mg or less. The dose of 425-500mg showed similar efficacy to Phase Ⅲ clinical trial (850mg), while the mOS of 250mg was shorter. No new adverse events had been identified in this trial. Clinical trial information: NCT02668380.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?