Abstract:The deficit of mineral resources, the aggravation of environmental problems in the world, the decrease in non-renewable resources determined the increasing role of the responsibility of enterprises for the direct and indirect impact on the economic, environmental and social systems of their functioning. The systematization of scientific work in the field of corporate social responsibility showed the lack of comprehensive studies concerning the nature and strength of the impact of direct and latent factors on enterprises’ compliance with the principles of corporate social responsibility. In this research study, we hypothesized that the common contributing factors for corporate social responsibility benefits in the literature such as institutional pressures, market/societal pressures, and structural support are mediated by the factors of stakeholder influence and supervision effect. The data from an empirical survey of 334 corporate executives were collected to test our hypotheses of mediating effects. The partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) approach was used to test the 11 hypotheses from the research model. The research model is statistically significant with an explanatory power of R2 = 0.468 for the dependent variable CSR benefits. The statistical results show that the direct effects of the three common contributing factors to CSR are not significant. All the standardized path coefficients (β) of direct effects from institutional pressures, market/societal pressures, and structural support to corporate social responsibility benefits are less than 0.1. On the other hand, their effects are significant through the mediating factors of stakeholder influence and supervision. If we characterize stakeholder influence as words and supervision effect as deeds, then words are more significant than deeds (the path coefficient from supervision effect to corporate social responsibility benefits is 0.243, while from stakeholder influence to corporate social responsibility benefits is 0.443). Moreover, if we characterize external pressures as a stick and structural support as carrot, our research results show that stick (0.413 for market/societal pressures, 0.387 for institutional pressures) is more significant than the carrot (0.115) in effectuating corporate social responsibility benefits. Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility, Stakeholders, Supervision, Mediating Effect, Factors of Influence.

Stakeholder Relations, Environmental Sustainability And Sales Performance

Contingent View on the Relationship Between Proactive Environmental Strategy and Corporate Performance: Toward Stakeholder Engagement

Social Sustainability of a Firm: Orientation, Practices, and Performances

Stakeholder Engagement and Competitive Advantage of the Firms——The Case of Corporate Environmental Management in China

Navigating sustainable development: Empirical analysis of corporate social responsibility, eco‐friendly production, and stakeholder green commitment through the lens of stakeholder theory

Environment Sustainability Is a Corporate Social Responsibility: Measuring the Nexus between Sustainable Supply Chain Management, Big Data Analytics Capabilities, and Organizational Performance

Green supply chain management for operational performance: anteceding impact of corporate social responsibility and moderating effects of relational capital

Evaluating sex and gender competencies in the medical curriculum: a case study.

Green initiatives and stakeholder engagement: Unveiling the impact of green strategies and CSR on financial performance from descriptive‐normative perspectives of stakeholder theory

Mediating Effects of Stakeholders and Supervision on Corporate Social Responsibility

Multidirectional analysis for sustainable development: An examination of sustainable policies, corporate social responsibility, and organizational performance

Improving Corporate Performance through Stakeholder-Based ESG Practices

Influencing Mechanism of Green Human Resource Management and Corporate Social Responsibility on Organizational Sustainable Performance

The Driving Force of Improving Coroparate Environmental Performance Based on the Stakeholder Theory

How Stakeholder Pressure Influence Corporate Sustainability, and Financial Performance in Manufacturing Industries of Pakistan: The Mediatory Role of Sustainable Supply Chain Management

The Impact of Supply Chain Social Responsibility on Sustainable Performance

Environmental Marketing Strategy Effects on Market-Based Assets

The Impact of Environmental Orientation on Supplier Green Management and Financial Performance: the Moderating Role of Relational Capital

The Impact of Partnerships and Information Sharing on Corporate Sustainable Performance: A Mediation Model Moderated by Government Support

Promoting sustainable development: Multiple mediation effects of green value co‐creation and green dynamic capability between green market pressure and firm performance

Advancing eco-excellence: Integrating stakeholders’ pressures, environmental awareness, and ethics for green innovation and performance