An Ecological Study on Zooplankton in the Northern Beibu Gulf V: the Effects of Microzooplankton Grazing on Phytoplankton in Summer
MA Lu,CAO Wenqing,ZHANG Wenjing,LIN Yuanshao,ZHENG Lianming,YANG Weidi,WANG Yujie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb201207201034
2013-01-01
Acta Ecologica Sinica
Abstract:In August 2011,we quantified the impact of microzooplankton grazing on phytoplankton production in the surface waters of the northern Beibu Gulf,Vietnam. Shipboard dilution incubation experiments were carried out at five stations to calculate phytoplankton specific growth rates and the specific rates of grazing losses to microzooplankton. Dilution experiments using chlorophyll a( Chl a) as a tracer were used to estimate daily rates in two size fractions; image-analyzed microscopy provided quantitative estimates of microzooplankton standing stock( including ciliate and vertebrate larvae). PFW( particle-free water) was used to dilute seawater to five target dilutions of 0%,20%,40%,60%,and 80%. Microzooplankton grazing and phytoplankton growth rates were estimated by the linear regression of AGR( apparent growth rate) versus dilution factor. We estimated the grazing impact of microzooplankton on phytoplankton by calculating the percentage of phytoplankton standing stock and potential primary production ingested. Average total chlorophyll a concentration was( 0. 67 ± 0. 58) μg / L. Small-celled phytoplankton dominated this particular community. A notable characteristic of the phytoplankton community structure was that nano- and picoplankton made up a significant portion. Aloricate ciliates dominated the microzooplankton samples,in particular Strombidium,which accounted for 27.2% of total aloricate ciliate abundance. In addition,loricate ciliates and copepod nauplii were recorded. Microzooplankton densityvaried from 400 to 1167 ind / L. The horizontal distribution of microzooplankton was greater in nearshore than in offshore waters. Abundance did not differ significantly with chlorophyll a concentration in this study; however,there was a positive correlation between microzooplankton abundance and temperature. The phytoplankton growth rate( 200 μm) ranged between-1. 50 and 1. 13 d-1,with the highest values being associated with nearshore waters. Meanwhile phytoplankton mortality due to microzooplankton grazing( 0.33—1.08 d-1) was highest at the same nearshore sites; however,growth rates were low at these sites. Consequently,microzooplankton consumed 28. 1%—66. 0% of chlorophyll a standing stocks and-8.1%—438.4% of the primary production per day. However,the grazing rate of microzooplankton on nanoplankton( 2— 20 μm) varied from 1.87 to 0.52 d-1,with an average of( 0.94±0.57) d-1. Given that the rates of grazing on phytoplankton of 200 μm were lower than those on nanoplankton,we conclude that microzooplankton prefer to graze on nanoplankton. There was a positive correlation between phytoplankton growth rate and grazing rate; in addition,significant differences between grazing rate and chlorophyll a were found. This suggests that microzooplankton grazing activity is the main factor regulating the community structure and restraining the growth of phytoplankton. During the investigation period, microzooplankton grazing effectively controlled the growth of phytoplankton,consuming 176.2% of primary production on average. When grazing rates are far greater than phytoplankton growth rates,energy is transferred from lower to higher trophic levels more effectively. In the surface waters of the northern Beibu Gulf,microzooplankton largely control the growth of phytoplankton by grazing offshore rather than in nearshore waters where primary production is high. The growth and grazing rates combined promote planktonic ecosystem stability in this area. These results indicate that grazing by microzooplankton is a key process controlling the growth of phytoplankton in this area.