Microzooplankton Herbivory and Phytoplankton Biomass and Composition in Jiaozhou Bay, China

John Dawson
2002-01-01
Abstract:Microzooplankton grazing on phytoplankton (as measured by chlorophyll a) inside and outside of the Jiaozhou Bay, China, was investigated during June and July 2002. Four samples were evaluated for quantification of phytoplankton species composition, biovolumes and carbon biomasses of phytoplankton, carbon-to-chlorophyll a mass ratio for phytoplankton, phytoplankton net growth rate, microzooplankton species composition, grazing rate, and grazing pressure, which was estimated from the percentage of potential production ingested per day, the percentage of standing stock ingested per day, and the carbon-specific rate of ingestion. Two samples from outside Jiaozhou Bay and two samples from inside Jiaozhou Bay were collected and analyzed. In both samples taken from outside the bay, Cylindrotheca closterium and Skeletonema costatum were identified as the dominant phytoplankton species. The dominant microzooplankton species in both of these samples was Tintinnopsis angustior. Of the two samples from the bay proper, one was collected in an open section of the bay, while the other was collected in a harbor area. The former had the same dominant phytoplankton species as the two samples from outside the bay, while the latter had Skeletonema costatum, Eucampia zodiacus, and Chaetoceros curvisetus as the dominant phytoplankton species. Tintinnopsis angustior and unidentified Strombidium spp. were the most prevalent microzooplankton in these samples. Phytoplankton biomasses and carbon-to-chlorophyll a mass ratios were greater inside the bay than outside. The rates of growth of phytoplankton in the absence of grazing were greater outside the bay; the rates of gr azing mortality due to of microzooplank ton and the percentages of primary production and standing stock consumed were lowest in the harbor area of the bay. Rates of consumption of phytoplankton carbon by microzooplank ton were greater inside the bay. A possible cause for these differences in grazing is the difference in phytoplankton cell sizes among the three locations studied, the largest-cell phytoplankton being present in the harbor area. Another possible cause is differences in grazing habits between the two dominant microzooplankton species.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?