Abstract:Purpose: To compare the performance of a low-addition silicone hydrogel multifocal soft lens with other soft lens correction options in a group of habitual soft lens wearers of distance correction who are symptomatic of early presbyopia. Method: This clinical study was designed as a prospective, double-masked, randomized, crossover, dispensing trial consisting of four 1-week phases, one for each of the correction modalities: a low-addition silicone hydrogel multifocal soft lens, monovision, habitual correction, and optimized distance visual correction. The prescriptions of all modalities were finalized at a single fitting visit, and the lenses were worn according to a randomized schedule. All lenses were made from lotrafilcon B material. A series of objective vision tests were conducted: high- and low-contrast LogMAR under high- and low-room lighting conditions, stereopsis, and critical print size. A number of other data collection methods used were novel: some data were collected under controlled laboratory-based conditions and others under "real-world" conditions, some of which were completed on a BlackBerry hand-held communication device. Results: All participants were able to be fit with all four correction modalities. Objective vision tests showed no statistical difference between the lens modalities except in the case of low-contrast near LogMAR acuity under low-lighting levels where monovision (+0.29 +/- 0.10) performed better than the multifocal (+0.33 +/- 0.11, P=0.027) and the habitual (+0.37 +/- 0.12, P<0.001) modalities. Subjective ratings indicated a statistically better performance provided by the multifocal correction compared with monovision, particularly for the vision associated with driving tasks such as driving during the daytime (93.3 +/- 8.8 vs. 84.2 +/- 23.7, P=0.05), at nighttime (88.8 +/- 11.7 vs. 74.9 +/- 23.6, P=0.001), any associated haloes or glare (92.0 +/- 10.6 vs. 78.0 +/- 22.8, P=0.003), and observing road signs (90.1 +/- 11.8 vs. 79.4 +/- 20.2, P=0.027). Preference for the multifocal compared with monovision was also reported when watching television (95.0 +/- 6.4 vs. 82.6 +/- 20.1, P=0.001) and when changing focus from distance to near (87.0 +/- 13.4 vs. 66.1 +/- 32.2, P<0.001). Conclusions: For this group of early presbyopes, the AIR OPTIX AQUA MULTIFOCAL--Low Add provided a successful option for visual correction, which was supported by the results of subjective ratings, many of which were made during or immediately after performing such activities as reading, using a computer, watching television, and driving. These results suggest that making a prediction of "success or not" based on consulting room acuity tests alone is probably unwise.

Visual Acuity Performance Across Different Near ADD Powers with a New Multifocal Daily Disposable Lens

Evaluation of the Visual Performance of a New Multifocal Contact Lens and the Impact of Refractive Error

A Study of the Amplitude of Pseudoaccommodation in Eyes after Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation

Efficacy of a new refractive multifocal contact lens for presbyopia

Visual Quality Indicators with Multifocal and Dual-Focus Soft Contact Lenses for Myopia Control

Patient selection to optimize near vision performance with a low-addition trifocal lens

Comparison of visual performance and image quality between a myopia-control contact lens and a single-vision contact lens

Inverting peripheral hyperopic defocus into myopic defocus among myopic schoolchildren using addition power of multifocal contact lens

Comparison of visual performance between diffractive bifocal and diffractive trifocal intraocular lenses

The effect of multifocal contact lenses on the dynamic accommodation step response

Preliminary Clinical Study of the Apodized Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens

Early symptomatic presbyopes--what correction modality works best?

Intraocular Straylight and Multifocal Soft Contact Lens Fit With a Myopia Control Approach

Visual Performance with Accommodating and Multifocal Intraocular Lenses.

Comparison of Dynamic Visual Acuity after Implantation of Toric Bifocal or Trifocal Intraocular Lens in Age-Related Cataract Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Predicting Short-Term Subjective Vision Performance of Contact Lenses Used in Myopia Control

The influence of large-diameter multifocal contact lens on ocular surface, visual quality, and visual function for presbyopic adults with dry eye syndromes

Refractive power profiles of commercially available soft multifocal contact lenses for myopia control

Spatio-chromatic vision with multifocal diffractive intraocular lens

Clinical evaluation of a multifocal aspheric diffractive intraocular lens

Comparison of peripheral refraction and higher-order aberrations between orthokeratology and multifocal soft contact lens designed with highly addition