Optimal Flow Type in Internally-Cooled Liquid-Desiccant System Driven by Heat Pump: Component Level Vs. System Level
Bowen Guan,Xiaohua Liu,Tao Zhang,Jun Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116208
IF: 6.4
2020-01-01
Applied Thermal Engineering
Abstract:The internally-cooled liquid-desiccant (ICLD) air-conditioning system has been increasingly popular, owing to its energy-efficient performance. The air and solution can have different flow types in the ICLD system, i.e., parallel flow, cross flow, and counter flow. Counter flow is believed to be optimal among the flow types for a simple heat exchanger, owing to its competitive heat exchanger effectiveness. However, this no longer applies to the ICLD system circumstance. To reveal the reason difference, the optimal flow type in the heat-pump driven ICLD system is discussed at two levels in this study, i.e., the component (dehumidifier/regenerator) level and the system level. At the component level, the results reveal that the heat and mass transfer driving force may reverse in the counter flow dehumidifier/regenerator, which can deteriorate its performance significantly. Counter flow may lead to the worst dehumidification/regenerator performance. At the system level, the counter flow system shows a benefit in reducing heat-cold offset. The COPsys, of the counter flow system is 7.2%-26.4% and 1.4%-5.3% superior to those of the parallel flow and cross flow systems, respectively. Thus, the counter flow is recommended in ICLD systems, because of its low heat-cold offset, rather than because of its competitive dehumidification/regeneration performance.