ANTIANGIOGENIC METRONOMIC THERAPY FOR CHILDREN WITH RECURRENT EPENDYMOMA

Jens-Martin Huebner,Konstantin Okonechnikov,Ji Wen,Wilda Orisme,Bo Tang,Sujuan Jia,Ruth Tatevossian,Jinghui Zhang,Stefan M. Pfister,Kristian W. Pajtler,David W. Ellison,Marcel Kool
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noy059.207
2018-01-01
Neuro-Oncology
Abstract:Patients with relapse ependymoma have few therapy options and a short median survival time regardless of salvage treatment. The aim of this study is to evaluate the activity of multidrug antiangiogenic treatment in recurrent ependymoma patients. We evaluated the use of biweekly intravenous bevacizumab in combination with five oral drugs (thalidomide, celecoxib, fenofibrate, and oral etoposide/cyclophosphamide) in 9 recurrent ependymoma patients between September 2015 and August 2017. The median aged at beginning of treatment was 7.7y (3.7–11.8). 8 patients began therapy for progression disease (6 local/2 metastatic; 1 first/7 multiple) and 1 because residual tumor after conventional treatment. Objective tumor response was 88% (8), including 5 with partial response and 3 with stable disease. Best response was observed 4.4 months (2.8–5.4) since starting treatment. The median treatment time was 10.6 months (3.4–21). Median time to progression(PFS) was 10.7 months. Median overall survival(OS) was 14.4 months (3.4–27.8). The OS and PFS after 6 months was 100% and 87% respectively; and after 12 months 50% and 37%. At last follow-up, 4 patients (44%) are alive including 2 still undergoing treatment. One patients remain alive and progression free at 16 months and another is alive with disease at 27 months. Therapy was generally well tolerated. This 5-drug regimen plus Bevacizumab produces objective responses with minimal toxicity in children with recurrent ependymoma. This antiangiogenic metronomic therapy could be an evolving alternative approach to recurrent ependymoma and it would be included as part of conventional treatment for unresectable ependymoma.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?