The Difference in Aging Behaviors and Mechanisms Between Floating Charge and Cycling of LiFePO4/graphite Batteries

Shouzhong Yi,Bo Wang,Ziang Chen,Rui Wang,Dianlong Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-018-2607-2
IF: 2.961
2018-01-01
Ionics
Abstract:The performance of LiFePO4 (LFP)/graphite batteries would decline during floating-charge and cycling aging. The main aging factors are same for these two application modes. However, there are differences between the aging rates, aging factors on positive, and negative electrodes when batteries undergone floating-charge and cycling mode. In this work, LFP/graphite batteries were assembled and tested under different floating-charge and cycling conditions. By combining XRD and SEM techniques, it can be found that the capacity loss rates for cycling mode were larger than floating-charge mode. On the other hand, although both the electrode structures of LFP and graphite would deteriorate for both cycling and floating-charge mode, the electrochemical performance of LFP positive electrode were relatively more stable than graphite electrode. Moreover, the influence of the deterioration of graphite electrode on the separator were also studied and analyzed. And the differences of aging mechanism for floating-charge and cycling mode were also discussed.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?