Abstract:Recent local measurements of the Hubble constant made using supernovae have delivered a value that differs by $\sim$5$\sigma$ (statistical error) from predictions using the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), or using Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) and Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN) constraints, which are themselves consistent. The effective volume covered by the supernovae is small compared to the other probes, and it is therefore interesting to consider whether sample variance (often also called cosmic variance) is a significant contributor to the offset. We consider four ways of calculating the sample variance: (i) perturbation theory applied to the luminosity distance, which is the most common method considered in the literature; (ii) perturbation of cosmological parameters, as is commonly used to alleviate super-sample covariance in sets of N-body simulations; (iii) a new method based on the variance between perturbed spherical top-hat regions; (iv) using numerical N-body simulations. All give consistent results showing that, for the Pantheon supernova sample, sample variance can only lead to fluctuations in $H_0$ of order $\pm1$ km s$^{-1}$Mpc$^{-1}$ or less. While this is not in itself a new result, the agreement between the methods used adds to its robustness. Furthermore, it is instructive to see how the different methods fit together. We also investigate the internal variance of the $H_{0}$ measurement using SH0ES and Pantheon data. By searching for an offset between measurements in opposite hemispheres, we find that the direction coincident with the CMB dipole has a higher $H_{0}$ measurement than the opposite hemisphere by roughly 4 km s$^{-1}$Mpc$^{-1}$. We compare this with a large number of simulations and find that the size of this asymmetry is statistically likely, but the preference of direction may indicate that further calibration is needed.

Testing the Anisotropy of Cosmic Acceleration from Pantheon Supernovae Sample

Probing the Isotropy of Cosmic Acceleration Using Different Supernova Samples

Anisotropy of Cosmic Acceleration

Testing cosmic anisotropy with Pantheon sample and quasars at high redshifts

Testing the isotropy of cosmic acceleration with Pantheon+ and SH0ES: A cosmographic analysis

Consistency of Pantheon+ supernovae with a large-scale isotropic universe

Testing the isotropy of cosmic acceleration with the and SH0ES datasets: A cosmographic analysis

On the isotropy of SnIa absolute magnitudes in the Pantheon+ and SH0ES samples

Anisotropy in the cosmic acceleration inferred from supernovae

Anisotropic Distance Ladder in Pantheon+ Supernovae

Constraints on anisotropic cosmic expansion from supernovae

Testing cosmic anisotropy with Padé approximations and the latest Pantheon+ sample

Analyzing Pantheon SNeIa data in the context of Barrow's variable speed of light

Pantheon+ tomography and Hubble tension

Model-independent Test of the Cosmic Anisotropy with Inverse Distance Ladder

Testing cosmic anisotropy with Pade approximation and Pantheon+ sample

Probing the anisotropic expansion from supernovae and GRBs in a model-independent way

Testing the cosmological principle with the Pantheon+ sample and the region-fitting method

The Dipole of the Pantheon+SH0ES Data

A robust assessment of the local anisotropy of the Hubble constant

Sample Variance for Supernovae Distance Measurements and the Hubble tension