Abstract:Context . The cosmological concordance model (ΛCDM) is the current standard model in cosmology thanks to its ability to reproduce the observations. The first observational evidence for this model appeared roughly 20 years ago from the type-Ia supernovae (SNIa) Hubble diagram from two different groups. However, there has been some debate in the literature concerning the statistical treatment of SNIa, and their stature as proof of cosmic acceleration. Aims . In this paper we relax the standard assumption that SNIa intrinsic luminosity is independent of redshift, and examine whether it may have an impact on our cosmological knowledge and more precisely on the accelerated nature of the expansion of the universe. Methods . To maximise the scope of this study, we do not specify a given cosmological model, but we reconstruct the expansion rate of the universe through a cubic spline interpolation fitting the observations of the different cosmological probes: SNIa, baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), and the high-redshift information from the cosmic microwave background (CMB). Results . We show that when SNIa intrinsic luminosity is not allowed to vary as a function of redshift, cosmic acceleration is definitely proven in a model-independent approach. However, allowing for redshift dependence, a nonaccelerated reconstruction of the expansion rate is able to fit, at the same level of ΛCDM, the combination of SNIa and BAO data, both treating the BAO standard ruler r d as a free parameter (not entering on the physics governing the BAO), and adding the recently published prior from CMB observations. We further extend the analysis by including the CMB data. In this case we also consider a third way to combine the different probes by explicitly computing r d from the physics of the early universe, and we show that a nonaccelerated reconstruction is able to nicely fit this combination of low- and high-redshift data. We also check that this reconstruction is compatible with the latest measurements of the growth rate of matter perturbations. We finally show that the value of the Hubble constant ( H 0 ) predicted by this reconstruction is in tension with model-independent measurements. Conclusions . We present a model-independent reconstruction of a nonaccelerated expansion rate of the universe that is able to fit all the main background cosmological probes nicely. However, the predicted value of H 0 is in tension with recent direct measurements. Our analysis points out that a final reliable and consensual value for H 0 is critical to definitively prove cosmic acceleration in a model-independent way.

Anisotropy in the cosmic acceleration inferred from supernovae

Constraints on anisotropic cosmic expansion from supernovae

Model-independent cosmic acceleration and redshift-dependent intrinsic luminosity in type-Ia supernovae

Probing the Isotropy of Cosmic Acceleration Using Different Supernova Samples

Anisotropy of Cosmic Acceleration

The Acceleration History of the Universe and the Properties of the Dark Energy

Is the present expansion of the universe really accelerating?

Marginal evidence for cosmic acceleration from Type Ia supernovae

Dark Energy or Apparent Acceleration Due to a Relativistic Cosmological Model More Complex than FLRW?

New analysis of SNeIa Pantheon Catalog: Variable speed of light as an alternative to dark energy

Testing the Anisotropy of Cosmic Acceleration from Pantheon Supernovae Sample

Constraining Dark Energy and Cosmological Transition Redshift with Type Ia Supernovae

Supernovae Light Curves: An Argument for a New Distance Modulus

Characterising Dark Energy through supernovae

Cosmological inference from within the peculiar local universe

Testing the isotropy of the Universe with type Ia supernovae in a model-independent way

Improved Constraints on the Acceleration History of the Universe and the Properties of the Dark Energy

Anisotropic Distance Ladder in Pantheon+ Supernovae

Model independent constraints on the cosmological expansion rate

Non-Gaussian Likelihoods for Type Ia Supernovae Cosmology: Implications for Dark Energy and $H_0$

Studying the Peculiar Velocity Bulk Flow in a Sparse Survey of Type-Ia SNe