Incidence and Related Risk Factors of Radiographic Knee Osteoarthritis in a Chinese Suburban Area: Shunyi Osteoarthritis Study

C. Lin,X. Wu,Q. Liu,X. Cheng,Y. Chen,Y. Ke,J. Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2018.02.458

IF: 7.507

2018-01-01

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

Abstract:Purpose: To describe the incidence of radiographic knee osteoarthritis (ROA) in a Chinese suburban area and to examine the risk factors for ROA incidence in a population-based longitudinal study. Methods: Shunyi Osteoarthritis Study was a population-based, longitudinal and prospective study of knee osteoarthritis in a Chinese suburban area around Beijing. From August to October in 2013, 1295 residents aged over 50 years were recruited by randomized cluster sampling with fully informed and were followed 4 years later in August and September, 2017. At the time of baseline and follow-up visits, subjects completed a home interview questionnaire (including socio-demographic factors, history of knee injury, joint symptoms, etc) and received a clinical examination including height, weight, range of motion, chair stand test, 50 feet walk test, and weight-bearing posteroanterior semiflexed view of radiographs at tibiofemoral joints. Knee radiographs were read by one experienced investigator on the basis of Kellgren and Lawrence (K/L) criteria on the condition that the reader was blinded to the time sequence of knee radiographs. A knee as having ROA was defined if its K/L grade is no less than grade 2, while for a knee with both ROA and knee pain (occurred in at least one month in past year), symptomatic osteoarthritis (SxOA) could be diagnosed. Logistic regression was used to examine the association of socio-demographic factors (i.e., age, sex, Body Mass Index (BMI), education levels, history of knee injury) and physical functions examined by range of motion, flexion contracture, 50 feet walk test (the least amount of seconds to walk 50 feet), chair stand test (the least amount of seconds to stand up from a chair for 5 times) at baseline to the risk of incident ROA. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) was used to explain the role of the contralateral knee conditions. Results: A total of 1295 participants (2590 knees) were recruited at baseline in 2013, and 967 (74.7%) residents were followed in 2017. The rest of 328 (25.3%) residents were excluded for the loss to follow-up due to loss of contact, death, rejection, move out, etc. Besides, 546 knees with K/L grade no less than grade 2 were also excluded for further analysis of the risk factors of the incident ROA. Of all the knees (n = 1382) without ROA at baseline, 182 knees (13.2%) developed incident ROA. That is to say, the incidence of ROA in knee level is annually 3.3% in this study. As shown in Table 1, different factors were test for the relationship with incident ROA. Advanced age (per year, adjusted odds ratio(OR) = 1.082, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.054–1.112), higher BMI (adjusted OR = 1.027, 95% CI: 1.001–1.055), female (adjusted OR = 1.491, 95% CI: 1.015–2.189), less range of motion at baseline (per degree, adjusted OR = 0.959, 95% CI: 0.936–0.983), less leg strength and endurance at baseline (estimated by chair stand test, per second, adjusted OR = 1.081, 95% CI: 1.002–1.168) were relevant risk factors for incident ROA, while injury history, education, flexion contracture, walk capability (estimated by 50-feet walk test) were not. Taking the baseline contralateral knee joint conditions into consideration, tested by GEE, contralateral ROA (adjusted OR = 6.323, 95% CI: 3.153–12.681) as well as contralateral SxOA (adjusted OR = 4.456, 95% CI: 1.221–16.257) were strongly associated with ROA incidence, rather than contralateral knee pain. Conclusions: The incidence of ROA in Chinese suburban area was 3.3% annually in knee level according to this study. Advanced age, higher BMI, female, less leg strength and endurance, less range of motion along with contralateral ROA and SxOA were promoters for the incident ROA.