Natural History and Risk Factors of Radiographic Knee Osteoarthritis: Wuchuan Osteoarthritis Study
Q. Liu,J. Niu,Y. Ke,J. Huang,Q. Jin,X. Wu,X. Tang,Z. Cao,Y. Zhang,J. Lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2015.02.959
IF: 7.507
2015-01-01
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Abstract:Purpose: To describe risk of radiographic knee osteoarthritis (ROA) worsening and to examine the risk factors for ROA worsening in a population-based longitudinal study. Methods: Wuchuan Osteoarthritis Study was a population-based longitudinal study of natural history of knee osteoarthritis and its risk factors. Between August and October 2005, 1025 residents aged ≥ 50 years were recruited using door-to-door enumeration in randomly selected rural communities in Wuchuan, China, and were followed until November 2013. At baseline and follow-up visits, subjects completed a home interview (including socio-demographic factors, history of knee injury, joint symptoms, physical activity and work history) and had a clinical examination including height, weight and weight-bearing posteroanterior semiflexed view of radiographs at tibiofemoral (TF) joints. Knee radiographs were read by one investigator according to Kellgren and Lawrence (K/L) criteria. Reader was blinded to the time sequence of knee radiographs. For each batch of Wuchuan OA Study films (n=100), 10 films from the Osteoarthritis Initiatives (OAI) were added to test inter-reader reliability. In addition, 10 previously read knee radiographs from the Wuchuan OA Study were fed back to the reader to test intra-reliability. Kappa statistics for inter-reader and intra-reader reliability were 0.86 and 0.92 respectively. We defined a knee as having K/L grade worsening if its K/L grade increased by at least 1 grade except for the change from 0 to 1 during follow-up. We used logistic regression to examine the association of each risk factor at baseline (i.e. age, sex, Body Mass Index (BMI), education levels, history of knee injury, and duration of each physical activities) to the risk of K/L grade worsening. Generalized estimating equation was used to account for the correlation between two knees. Results: Of 1,025 participants (2050 knees) in the original study, 389 (38%) did not participate follow-up visit owing to lost to follow-up (n=290) or death (n=99), 7 knees with K/L grade 4 at baseline were excluded from analysis. Of 635 subjects (1265 knees) who had the follow-up visit and with K/L grade ≤ 3 at baseline (women: 50.7%, mean age at baseline: 55.1 years), 208 (18.5%) knees with K/L grade ≤ 1 at baseline (n=1124) developed incident ROA (i.e., K/L grade increased to ≥ 2) and 71 (50.4%) knees with K/L grade 2 or 3 at baseline (n=141) developed progressive ROA (i.e. K/L grade increased ≥ 1 grade) over 8 years of follow-up. 279 (22.1%) knees' K/L grade worsened during follow-up period. As shown in Table 1, female gender (odds ratio (OR) = 1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.3- 2.6), older age (OR for 5-year difference = 1.3, 95% CI: 1.2- 1.5), and higher BMI (OR for 1-unit increase = 1.1, 95% CI: 1.0-1.2) were strongly associated with risk of K/L grade worsening. However, no apparent association was found between education, history of knee injury and K/L grade worsening. Longer duration of standing, walking, walking on bumpy road, and job involved in digging were associated with higher risk of K/L grade worsening (OR ranges from 1.8 to 2.1). Bending, kneeling, squatting, and lifting heavy objects were not significantly associated with K/L grade worsening. Conclusions: In this population-based longitudinal study conducted among residents in rural areas, China, incidence of knee radiographic worsening was high. Several previously reported risk factors for knee ROA were also associated with knee radiographic worsening among Chinese population.Tabled 1Table 1. Association between each risk factor and risk of knee K/L grade worsening.Potential risk factorsLevelN (%) of knees with K/L grade worseningAdjusted OR (95% CI)P-valueBaseline socio-demographic, BMl, and history of knee injury [1]Age (5 years)1.3 (1.2, 1.5)<0.001BMl (1 kg/m2)1.1 (1.0, 1.2)0.001Educationprimary school200/893 (22.4)middle school or above79/379 (20.8)0.9 (0.6, 1.3)0.599GenderMen102/627(16.3)Women177/645 (27.4)1.8 (1.3, 2.6)0.001History of knee injuryNo262/1218 (21.5)Yes17/54 (31.5)1.4 (0.7, 2.5)0.315Duration of physical activity at work, year [2]Standing ≥ 2 hours per day0-2969/208 (33.2)130-39212/677 (31.3)1.4 (0.8, 2.3)0.19740+155/387 (40.1)1.9 (1.0, 3.7)0.05Walking ≥ 2 hours per day0-2967/208 (32.2)130-39214/677 (31.6)1.5 (0.9, 2.4)0.14440+155/387 (40.1)2.0 (1.0, 3.9)0.04Walking on bumpy road ≥ 2 hours per day0-2971/224 (31.7)130-39210/669 (31.4)1.4 (0.9, 2.4)0.14240+155/379 (40.9)2.1 (1.1, 3.9)0.021Digging ≥ 2 hours per day0313/921 (34.0)11-3968/236 (28.8)0.9 (0.6, 1.5)0.75240+55/115 (47.8)1.8 (1.0, 3.1)0.045Bending ≥ 2 hours per day0-2975/228 (32.9)130-39208/663 (31.4)1.2 (0.7, 1.8)0.51740+153/381 (40.2)1.5 (0.8, 2.8)0.167Kneeling ≥ 30 minutes per day0245/717(34.2)11-39122/383 (31.9)1.1 (0.7, 1.6)0.64340+69/172 (40.1)1.2 (0.7, 1.9)0.529Squatting ≥ 30 minutes per day0129/369 (35.0)11-39191/621 (30.8)0.9 (0.6, 1.4)0.74340+116/282 (41.1)1.2 (0.7, 1.9)0.541Lifting ≥ 10kg object per day0-937/87 (42.5)110-39261/837 (31.2)0.8 (0.4, 1.5)0.43640+138/348 (39.7)1.1 (0.5, 2.0)0.876[1] Adjusting for each other[2] Adjusting for age, gender, BMl, education, history of knee injury Open table in a new tab [1] Adjusting for each other [2] Adjusting for age, gender, BMl, education, history of knee injury