Abstract:This article provides evidence about the wealth change and redistribution effects of Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX), which requires that management assess and publicly report on the effectiveness of their firm's internal controls, and that auditors publicly provide an opinion on management's assessment, as well as the effectiveness of the internal controls. This section is the most expensive, burdensome and contentious part of SOX - mainly because the benefits are elusive, and according to some critics, non-existent. We analyze a sample of 102 firms that report a deficiency in their internal controls between November 1, 2003 and December 31, 2004 and that have no confounding news during the event window. We find that the cumulative size-adjusted abnormal returns are -1.8% during the three-day event window for firms that report internal control deficiencies. This economically-significant wealth change supports the idea that investors value internal control news and that they are not (at least fully) aware of these deficiencies prior to the disclosures. We confirm these results for a small sample of firms reporting deficiencies in the first calendar quarter of 2005. More importantly, using trading data from the NYSE TAQ database, we find that small- (large-) investor net buying is positively (not) associated with returns. More specifically, it is small-investor net selling that is driving the negative returns. These results are consistent with the redistribution of wealth from large to small investors during the announcement period. In summary, our results support the conjectures made by regulators underlying the regulation and show that small investors benefit more from these disclosures than large investors.

SOX Section 404 and Corporate Innovation

The Real Effects of SOX Section 404 : Evidence from Corporate Innovation

The Effects of Corporate Governance on Innovation in Chinese Firms ∗

The effects of corporate governance and ownership on the innovation performance of Chinese SMEs

Public Governance and Tunneling: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment in China

Do Short Sellers Affect Corporate Innovation? Evidence from a Policy Experiment

The Effect of SOX Internal Control Deficiencies on Firm Risk and Cost of Equity

Initial Public Offering, Corporate Innovation and Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from China

The effect of innovation performance shortfall on firms’ trade-offs between exploratory and exploitative innovation: Do corporate governance factors matterʔ

IRS scrutiny and corporate innovation

The Wealth Change and Redistribution Effects of Sarbanes-Oxley Internal Control Disclosures

Short Sellers and Innovation: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment

SHO Time for Innovation: the Real Effects of Short Sellers

Corporate Governance Reform and Executive Incentives: Implications for Investments and Risk Taking

The role of Corporate Governance in the nexus between Litigation Risk and Corporate Innovation

The Innovation and Reporting Consequences of Financial Regulation for Young Life‐Cycle Firms

State Ownership and Corporate Innovation Efficiency

Public governance and corporate innovation: evidence from a quasi-natural event in China

Does ESG Performance Improve the Quantity and Quality of Innovation? The Mediating Role of Internal Control Effectiveness and Analyst Coverage

Environmental Regulation and Firm Innovation: Evidence from National Specially Monitored Firms Program in China