Abstract:There is a growing body of evidence showing that humans make automatic and reliable personality inferences from facial appearance. Interestingly, it has been robustly shown that the recognition of other-race faces is impaired compared to same-race faces (the so-called other-race effect), with categorization of gender and age also achieved inefficiently. However, the extent to which the ability of making reliable inferences from faces generalizes across cultures and faces from different races is poorly understood. This issue is even timelier considering recent studies that have challenged the universality of face processing. For instance, we recently showed that Westerners predominantly fixate the eyes during face recognition, whereas Easterners fixate the central region of the face (i.e., nose) (Blais et al., 2008). Culture also modulates the strategy observers use to gather visual information during facial expression categorization (Jack et al., 2009). Therefore, asking whether social judgments from faces generalize across cultures is a natural question to be addressed. To this aim, we tested Western Caucasian and East Asian observers performing visual and social judgments from all the combinations of face pairs sampled from 40 Western Caucasian and 40 East Asian unfamiliar faces. Observers from both cultures first evaluated the physical and the social similarity of each face pair. Subsequently, observers performed binary social evaluations on the same face pairs for attractiveness, competence, trustworthiness and warmth. All binary decisions were paired with a measure of confidence. Finally, we represented the face space for each of the judgments in matrices of dissimilarity weighted by confidence levels for each observer and culture. Mantel correlations performed on the matrices of dissimilarity indicated a fairly robust agreement across cultures for all judgments, both visual and social. Our data show that humans rely on universal rules to perform trait inferences from facial appearance.

Other-race Categorisation Advantage in a Binary- Vs. Ternary-Response Race Categorisation Task

The Role of Configural Processing in Face Classification by Race: an ERP Study.

Two Faces Of The Other-Race Effect: Recognition And Categorisation Of Caucasian And Chinese Faces

The Other Face of the Other-Race Effect: an Fmri Investigation of the Other-Race Face Categorization Advantage.

Covariation in the recognition of own-race and other-race faces argues against the role of group bias in the other race effect

The Neural Correlates of Own- and Other-Race Face Recognition and Categorization: A Fmri Study

Different Brain Activations Between Own- and Other-Race Face Categorization: an Fmri Study Using Group Independent Component Analysis

Attitudes Influence Implicit Racial Face Categorization in a Perceptual Task

An ICA-Based Other-Race Effect Elimination for Facial Expression Recognition.

Different features for different races: Tracking the eyes of Asian, Black, and White participants viewing Asian, Black, and White Faces

Individuating and categorizing faces: The other-race effect is reduced by attending to racial but not identity cues

Social Judgments from Faces Are Universal

The Process of Category-and-Specific-Identity Information Retrieval in Face Perception

The Neural Basis of Contextual Influences on Face Categorization.

Modulation of Facial Expression on Other-Race Face Categorization

Own-Race Faces Capture Attention Faster Than Other-Race Faces: Evidence from Response Time and the N2pc

The other-race effect and holistic processing across racial groups

No evidence for an other-race effect in dominance and trustworthy judgements from faces

Studies on the Other-race Effect in Face Recognition

Non-phase-locked Alpha Oscillations Are Involved in Spontaneous Racial Categorization of Faces

Through the eyes of the own-race bias: Eye-tracking and pupillometry during face recognition