Abstract:The Other-Race Effect (ORE) is the robust and well-established finding that people are generally poorer at facial recognition of individuals of another race than of their own race. Over the past four decades, much research has focused on the ORE because understanding this phenomenon is expected to elucidate fundamental face processing mechanisms and the influence of experience on such mechanisms. Several recent studies of the ORE in which the eye-movements of participants viewing own- and other-race faces were tracked have, however, reported highly conflicting results regarding the presence or absence of differential patterns of eye-movements to own- versus other-race faces. This discrepancy, of course, leads to conflicting theoretical interpretations of the perceptual basis for the ORE. Here we investigate fixation patterns to own- versus other-race (African and Chinese) faces for Caucasian participants using different analysis methods. While we detect statistically significant, though subtle, differences in fixation pattern using an Area of Interest (AOI) approach, we fail to detect significant differences when applying a spatial density map approach. Though there were no significant differences in the spatial density maps, the qualitative patterns matched the results from the AOI analyses reflecting how, in certain contexts, Area of Interest (AOI) analyses can be more sensitive in detecting the differential fixation patterns than spatial density analyses, due to spatial pooling of data with AOIs. AOI analyses, however, also come with the limitation of requiring a priori specification. These findings provide evidence that the conflicting reports in the prior literature may be at least partially accounted for by the differences in the statistical sensitivity associated with the different analysis methods employed across studies. Overall, our results suggest that detection of differences in eye-movement patterns can be analysis-dependent and rests on the assumptions inherent in the given analysis.

No evidence for an other-race effect in dominance and trustworthy judgements from faces

Social Judgments from Faces Are Universal

Implicit bias and experience influence overall but not relative trustworthiness judgment of other-race faces

Covariation in the recognition of own-race and other-race faces argues against the role of group bias in the other race effect

Two Faces Of The Other-Race Effect: Recognition And Categorisation Of Caucasian And Chinese Faces

How is race perceived during adolescence? A meta-analysis of the own-race bias.

Other-race Categorisation Advantage in a Binary- Vs. Ternary-Response Race Categorisation Task

The other-race effect and holistic processing across racial groups

Racial Prejudice Affects Representations of Facial Trustworthiness

Differences in Looking at Own- and Other-Race Faces Are Subtle and Analysis-Dependent: An Account of Discrepant Reports

Individuating and categorizing faces: The other-race effect is reduced by attending to racial but not identity cues

Studies on the Other-race Effect in Face Recognition

Different features for different races: Tracking the eyes of Asian, Black, and White participants viewing Asian, Black, and White Faces

Revealing the neural representations underlying other-race face perception

Own-Race Faces Capture Attention Faster Than Other-Race Faces: Evidence from Response Time and the N2pc

The Role of Configural Processing in Face Classification by Race: an ERP Study.

The Impact of Social Motivation on the Other-Race Effect under High and Low Social Status

The Effects of Prediction on the Perception for Own-Race and Other-Race Faces

The Other Face of the Other-Race Effect: an Fmri Investigation of the Other-Race Face Categorization Advantage.

The other-race effect in facial expression processing: Behavioral and ERP evidence from a balanced cross-cultural study in women

One of Us? How Facial and Symbolic Cues to Own- Versus Other-Race Membership Influence Access to Perceptual Awareness