Policy Instrument Designed to Gain Transition Legitimacy: A Case of Chinese Nuclear Development

Yixin Dai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.12.002
IF: 9.377
2019-01-01
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
Abstract:Nuclear energy development may encounter significant opposition if it is not deemed as legitimate by the general public even in an authoritarian state like China. This paper collects policy instruments designed in four nuclear stations in China, and reports both advantages as well as disadvantages of a centralised authority. At the central level, four types of policy tools are designed to win nuclear legitimacy. At local level, however, education and monitoring tools are well implemented with the help of highly centralised administrative system, while information disclosure and participation tools are only partially implemented since they need innovative reform of citizen deliberation and involvement mechanism. Instead, local government and nuclear firms design various legitimacy-oriented policies such as institutionalizing nuclear into local culture and social life. However, there still lacks of effective policy design for long-term legitimacy winning in China that clearly defines the concept of "the public" and "legitimacy".
What problem does this paper attempt to address?