Abstract:Differential privacy (DP), as a rigorous mathematical definition quantifying privacy leakage, has become a well-accepted standard for privacy protection. Combined with powerful machine learning (ML) techniques, differentially private machine learning (DPML) is increasingly important. As the most classic DPML algorithm, DP-SGD incurs a significant loss of utility, which hinders DPML's deployment in practice. Many studies have recently proposed improved algorithms based on DP-SGD to mitigate utility loss. However, these studies are isolated and cannot comprehensively measure the performance of improvements proposed in algorithms. More importantly, there is a lack of comprehensive research to compare improvements in these DPML algorithms across utility, defensive capabilities, and generalizability. We fill this gap by performing a holistic measurement of improved DPML algorithms on utility and defense capability against membership inference attacks (MIAs) on image classification tasks. We first present a taxonomy of where improvements are located in the ML life cycle. Based on our taxonomy, we jointly perform an extensive measurement study of the improved DPML algorithms, over twelve algorithms, four model architectures, four datasets, two attacks, and various privacy budget configurations. We also cover state-of-the-art label differential privacy (Label DP) algorithms in the evaluation. According to our empirical results, DP can effectively defend against MIAs, and sensitivity-bounding techniques such as per-sample gradient clipping play an important role in defense. We also explore some improvements that can maintain model utility and defend against MIAs more effectively. Experiments show that Label DP algorithms achieve less utility loss but are fragile to MIAs. ML practitioners may benefit from these evaluations to select appropriate algorithms. To support our evaluation, we implement a modular re-usable software, DPMLBench,(1) which enables sensitive data owners to deploy DPML algorithms and serves as a benchmark tool for researchers and practitioners.

Privacy-Accuracy Trade-Off in Differentially-Private Distributed Classification: A Game Theoretical Approach

Privacy-Accuracy Trade-Off in Distributed Data Mining

Privacy Preserving Distributed Classification: A Satisfaction Equilibrium Approach

Privacy Risks of Social Interaction Structure: Network Learning in Quadratic Games

Differentially Private Nash Equilibrium Seeking in Quadratic Network Games

PEM: A Practical Differentially Private System for Large-Scale Cross-Institutional Data Mining.

Two-Party Privacy Games: How Users Perturb When Learners Preempt

Not one but many Tradeoffs: Privacy Vs. Utility in Differentially Private Machine Learning

Privacy-Preserving Distributed Optimization and Learning

DPMLBench: Holistic Evaluation of Differentially Private Machine Learning

Differential Privacy-preserving Distributed Machine Learning

Locally Differentially Private Distributed Online Learning with Guaranteed Optimality

Differentially private Nash equilibrium seeking for networked aggregative games

Differentially-private Distributed Algorithms for Aggregative Games with Guaranteed Convergence

Utility–Privacy Trade-Off in Distributed Machine Learning Systems

Trade Privacy for Utility: A Learning-Based Privacy Pricing Game in Federated Learning

Incentivizing Crowdsensing-Based Noise Monitoring with Differentially-Private Locations

Differentially Private Distributed Estimation and Learning

Dynamic Private Task Assignment under Differential Privacy

A Privacy-Preserving Classification Mining Algorithm