Abstract:Obstructed defaecation syndrome (ODS) is a symptom complex consisting of a sense of incomplete evacuation, prolonged straining and a persisting desire to defaecate. In patients with ODS, structural abnormalities of the colorectum and the pelvic floor (including rectal intussuception, rectocele, enterocele and prolapse of the middle pelvic compartment) are nearly always present [1]. The aetiology and nature of rectal intussusception are debatable. Some believe that internal prolapse is a primary condition that progressively leads to a complete external protrusion of the rectum, and others think that folding of the rectal wall is secondary, being related to excessive straining as a consequence of altered rectal motility and hyposensitivity [2]. Assuming that external rectal prolapse is the end-point of a successive rectal wall descent, it is obvious to consider the same surgical approach for rectorectal and rectoanal intussusception as for rectal prolapse. Over the years, more than 100 different procedures have been described for surgical treatment of rectal prolapse but the optimal surgical approach has yet not been determined. The existence of so many surgical options is an indicator of the lack of one single successful procedure. There is considerable controversy regarding the indications for the different surgical interventions, and most evidence is derived from case series and nonrandomized cohort settings with only short-term follow up. As for external rectal prolapse, a variety of different operations have been described for rectal intussusception. Generally, a folding of the rectal wall can be prevented either by resection or by fixation. The underlying concept for both techniques is an attempt to correct the structural abnormality of the rectum and the pelvic floor. Rectopexy, with or without resection of any redundant sigmoid colon, and with or without insertion of a mesh, can be performed by open or laparoscopic surgery. Detailed data on the functional and longterm outcome are limited, and the published series are small. Stapled transanal rectal resection, known as the STARR procedure, was first described by Longo [3]. By using a circular stapler, this operation aims to remove redundant rectal wall, but the descent of the rectum and the pelvic floor is not corrected. Several specialized circular staplers, such as the Contour Transtar stapler and the TST STARR stapler, have subsequently been developed with the aim of excising an increasing amount of prolapsing tissue to improve the outcome. Serious and sometimes life-threatening complications, such as rectal perforation, severe bleeding with large hematoma formation and sepsis, have been reported following the STARR procedure. Faecal incontinence, anovaginal fistula formation and intractable pelvic pain are other complications that are unacceptable sequelae after treatment for a benign disorder, and there is a certain scepticism among many surgeons of these techniques [4]. Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse and ODS has achieved widespread use and popularity, especially in Europe, over the past decade. The method was first described in 2004 by D’Hoore et al. [5] who developed the technique as a laparoscopic nerve-sparing modification of the sutured posterior rectopexy that included complete mobilization of the rectum to the pelvic floor. Dissection posterior and lateral to the rectum may cause autonomic nerve damage and result in disturbance of the rectosigmoid motility and rectal reservoir capacity. Several previous studies have shown that up to 50% of all patients experience postoperative constipation and obstructed defaecation after posterior rectopexy [6,7]. Subsequently, laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy has been offered as a treatment option to patients with internal rectal prolapse and ODS. The anatomical abnormalities in the middle pelvic compartment are corrected by insertion of a mesh between the rectum and the vagina. The vaginal vault is fixed to the mesh, and the pouch of Douglas is thereby obliterated and the anterior rectal wall reinforced, aiming to prevent formation of enterocele, intussusception and rectocele during defaecation [5]. There are several controversies surrounding the increasing use of ventral mesh rectopexy. First, only Level 3 evidence exists. Unfortunately, there is a complete lack of systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials regarding this procedure for internal rectal prolapse, ODS or faecal incontinence. No studies have been identified that compare laparoscopic ventral rectopexy with other surgical treatments, non-

Unexpected finding of gastrointestinal stromal tumors during laparoscopic bariatric surgery

Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection of Small Bowel Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Open Resection in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: an Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Laparoscopic surgery versus open resection in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for obstructed defaecation syndrome: time for a critical appraisal

The Incidence of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in Obese Patients-A Large Single Center Experience

Systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic resection for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach

Laparoscopic Resection for Gastric Stromal Tumors with Sizes Larger Than 5 Cm

Can Incidental Gastric GISTs During Bariatric Surgeries Change the Primary Plan of Surgery? A Single Team Experience and a Systematic Review of Literature

Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: an Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Laparoscopic Wedge Resection of Synchronous Gastric Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Stromal Tumor: A Case Report

Laparoscopic Versus Open Wedge Resection for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors of the Stomach: a Single-Center 8-Year Retrospective Cohort Study of 156 Patients with Long-Term Follow-Up

Resection of GIST in the Duodenum and Proximal Jejunum: A Retrospective Analysis of Outcomes

Laparoscopic Transgastric Resection of Gastric Submucosal Tumors Located Near the Esophagogastric Junction.

S5198 Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Presenting at Gastroesophageal Junction: Case Report and Diagnostic Implications

Laparoscopic resection for gastric stromal tumor

[A case of chronic myeloid leukemia in blastic crisis with B-cell markers].

Unusual location of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): A case report and literature review of greater omentum location

Transumbilical Endoscopic Resection of Intra-abdominal Mesenchymal Tumor

Internal mammary-coronary artery bypass grafts: effects on experimental myocardial infarction.

Medullary post-inspiratory neuronal and diaphragm post-inspiratory activities during spontaneous augmented breaths in anesthetized rats