Morphology of Cricopharyngeal Muscle in Suspension Laryngeal Endoscope and Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

Guo Hongguang,Li Jinrang,Zhao Danheng,Liu Ya,Zhao Jing,Liu Liang,Peng Lili
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-7041.2016.03.013
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To determine whether laryngopharyngeal reflux(LPR)was associated with morphology of cricopharyngeal muscle ( CPM ) under suspension laryngoscope which is main part of upper esophageal sphincter.Methods The total of 147 consecutive patients(96 males and 51 females)aged from 15 to 71 years ( medium, 47 ) who presented to our institution for endoscopic microlaryngoscopic surgery from August 2013 to October 2014 were prospectively studied. According to the reflux symptom index( RSI) and reflux finding score(RFS), RSI >13 and RFS >7, the subjects were divided into LPR group (58 patients) and non-LPR group ( 89 patients ) . The laryngoscope was introduced down to postcricoid area exposing mucosa-covered CPM just at end of endoscopic microlaryngoscopic surgery. The shape of CPM was recorded in three types, namely, semi-bar, full-bar and flat. Pearson χ2 test was used for comparing the shape of CPM between LPR group and non-LPR group.Results CPM was exposed in 144 out of 147 subjects. There were 36 patients (63. 16%, 36/57) as semi-bar, 12 patients (21. 05%, 12/57) as full-bar and 9 patients (15. 79%, 9/57) as flat in LPR group. And in non-LPR group, there were 63 patients (72. 42%, 63/87) as semi-bar,11 patients (12. 64%, 11/87) as full-bar and 13 patients(14. 94%, 13/87) as flat. The shape of CPM had no differences between LPR group and non-LPR group(χ2 =1. 970, P>0.05).Conclusions The morphology of CPM in suspension laryngeal endoscope during microlaryngoscopic surgery is not related to LPR.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?