Competitions Between Social Exclusions and Rewards in the Optional Public Goods Game

Linjie Liu,Xiaojie Chen,Shengxian Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.23919/chicc.2017.8029160

2017-01-01

Abstract:The emergence of cooperative behavior is fundamental for a society to thrive. Some experimental studies have showed that reward outperforms punishment in repeated public goods games. On the other hand, recent theoretical researches have suggested that social exclusion can do better than costly punishment for resisting free riders. However, it remains unknown which one can be more effective for maintaining cooperation if reward and social exclusion work together in a population. In this paper, we first investigate the competition between pool exclusion and pool reward in the optional public goods game. Our results indicate that pool exclusion can outperform pool reward except for the condition of strong altruism, in which rewarders can benefit from the reward pool. Furthermore, we explore the competition between peer exclusion and peer reward, and we find that peer exclusion can always do better than peer reward no matter whether second-order exclusion and reward is considered or not. Our results reveal that social exclusion may play a more vital role in resisting free-riders than reward.