Abstract:STUDY QUESTION Does single cleavage-stage (Day 3) embryo transfer using a time-lapse (TL) hierarchical classification model achieve comparable ongoing pregnancy rates (OPR) to single blastocyst (Day 5) transfer by conventional morphological (CM) selection? SUMMARY ANSWER Day 3 single embryo transfer (SET) with a hierarchical classification model had a significantly lower OPR compared with Day 5 SET with CM selection. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Cleavage-stage SET is an alternative to blastocyst SET. Time-lapse imaging assists better embryo selection, based on studies of pregnancy outcomes when adding time-lapse imaging to CM selection at the cleavage or blastocyst stage. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This single-centre, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, non-inferiority study included 600 women between October 2015 and April 2017. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Eligible patients were Chinese females, aged ≤36 years, who were undergoing their first or second fresh IVF cycle using their own oocytes, and who had FSH levels ≤12 IU/mL on Day 3 of the cycle and 10 or more oocytes retrieved. Patients who had underlying uterine conditions, oocyte donation, recurrent pregnancy loss, abnormal oocytes or <6 normally fertilized embryos (2PN) were excluded from the study participation. Patients were randomized 1:1 to either the cleavage-stage SET with a time-lapse hierarchical classification model for selection (D3 + TL) or blastocyst SET with CM selection (D5 + CM). All normally fertilized zygotes were cultured in Primo Vision. The study was conducted at a tertiary IVF centre (CITIC-Xiangya) and OPR was the primary outcome. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE A total of 600 patients were randomized to the two groups, among which 585 (D3 + TL = 290, D5 + CM = 295) were included in the Modified-intention-to-treat (mITT) population and 517 (D3 + TL = 261, D5 + CM = 256) were included in the PP population. In the per protocol (PP) population, OPR was significantly lower in the D3 group (59.4%, 155/261) than in the D5 group (68.4%, 175/256) (difference: -9.0%, 95% CI: -17.1%, -0.7%, P = 0.03). Analysis in mITT population showed a marginally significant difference in the OPR between the D3 + TL and D5 + CM groups (56.6 versus 64.1%, difference: -7.5%, 95% CI: -15.4%, 0.4%, P = 0.06). The D3 + TL group resulted in a markedly lower implantation rate than the D5 + CM group (64.4 versus 77.0%; P = 0.002) in the PP analysis, however, the early miscarriage rate did not significantly differ between the two groups. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The study lacked a direct comparison between time-lapse and CM selections at cleavage-stage SET and was statistically underpowered to detect non-inferiority. The subject's eligibility criteria favouring women with a good prognosis for IVF weakened the generalizability of the results. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The OPR from Day 3 cleavage-stage SET using hierarchical classification time-lapse selection was significantly lower compared with that from Day 5 blastocyst SET using conventional morphology, yet it appeared to be clinically acceptable in women underwent IVF. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This study is supported by grants from Ferring Pharmaceuticals and the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University, China. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ChiCTR-ICR-15006600. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE 16 June 2015. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT 1 October 2015.

The Combined Use of Time-Lapse and Next-Generation Sequencing Improves Clinical Outcomes: Results from a Randomized Pilot Study

Selection of Single Blastocysts for Transfer Via Time-Lapse Monitoring Alone and with Next-Generation Sequencing to Reduce Multiple Pregnancies: A Randomized Pilot Study.

Frozen Versus Fresh Single Blastocyst Transfer in Ovulatory Women: a Multicentre, Randomised Controlled Trial.

Single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray-based preimplantation genetic diagnosis is likely to improve the clinical outcome for translocation carriers.

Application of Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidies with Next-Generation Sequencing in Women with Advanced Maternal Age

Selecting single euploid blastocysts for transfer with NGS significantly improves IVF treatment outcomes: a randomized study

Clinical outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening using next generation sequencing

Selection of Competent Blastocysts for Transfer by Combining Time-Lapse Monitoring and Array CGH Testing for Patients Undergoing Preimplantation Genetic Screening: a Prospective Study with Sibling Oocytes

Can Time-Lapse Incubation and Monitoring Be Beneficial to Assisted Reproduction Technology Outcomes? A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Day 3 Double Embryo Transfer

A pilot proof-of-principle study to compare fresh and vitrified cycle preimplantation genetic screening by chromosome microarray and next generation sequencing

Single Embryo Transfer by Day 3 Time-Lapse Selection Versus Day 5 Conventional Morphological Selection: a Randomized, Open-Label, Non-Inferiority Trial

Time-lapse and Ngs Evaluation of Morphokinetics, Ploidy and Clinical Outcome of Human Embryos Cultured in Continuous Single Culture Medium Versus Sequential Culture Medium: a Randomized Pilot Study

Randomized comparison of next-generation sequencing and array comparative genomic hybridization for preimplantation genetic screening: a pilot study

Comparison of embryo implantation potential between time-lapse incubators and standard incubators: A randomized controlled study

Non-invasive Embryo Selection Strategy for Clinical IVF to Avoid Wastage of Potentially Competent Embryos

In Vitro Fertilization with Single-nucleotide Polymorphism Microarray-based Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy Significantly Improves Clinical Outcomes in Infertile Women with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Comprehensive Chromosome screening using MALBAC-NGS with cleavage-state embryos as an option for treatment of patients with chromosomal disorders

Machine Learning-Guided Noninvasive Embryo Selection for Clinical in Vitro Fertilization Treatment to Avoid Wasting Potentially Qualified Embryos

Application of Two Blastocyst Biopsy Strategies in Preimplantation Genetic Testing Treatment and Assessment of Their Effects

A Study of Application Effects of Next-Generation Sequencing Based Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidies in Advanced Maternal Age Women

Clinical outcomes of single blastocyst transfer with machine learning guided noninvasive chromosome screening grading system in infertile patients