Non-invasive Embryo Selection Strategy for Clinical IVF to Avoid Wastage of Potentially Competent Embryos

Li Chen,Wen Li,Yuxiu Liu,Zhihang Peng,Liyi Cai,Ningyuan Zhang,Juanjuan Xu,Liang Wang,Xiaoming Teng,Yaxin Yao,Yangyun Zou,Menglin Ma,Jianqiao Liu,Sijia Lu,Haixiang Sun,Bing Yao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.03.006
IF: 4.567
2022-01-01
Reproductive BioMedicine Online
Abstract:Research question: Can a non-invasive embryo transfer strategy provide a reference for embryo selection to be established? Design: Chromosome sequencing of 345 paired blastocyst culture medium and whole blastocyst samples was carried out and a non-invasive embryo grading system was developed based on the random forest machine learning algorithm to predict blastocyst ploidy. The system was validated in 266 patients, and a blinded prospective observational study was conducted to investigate clinical outcomes between machine learning-guided and traditional non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (niPGT-A) analyses. Embryos were graded as A, B or C according to their euploidy probability levels predicted by non-invasive chromosomal screening (NICS). Results: Higher live birth rate was observed in A- versus C-grade embryos (50.4% versus 27.1%, P = 0.006) and B- versus C-grade embryos (45.3% versus 27.1%, P = 0.022) and lower miscarriage rate in A- versus C-grade embryos (15.9% versus 33.3%, P = 0.026) and B- versus C-grade embryos (14.3% versus 33.3%, P = 0.021). The embryo utilization rate was significantly higher through the machine learning strategy than the conventional dichotomic judgment of euploidy or aneuploidy in the niPGT-A analysis (78.8% versus 57.9%, P < 0.001). Better outcomes were observed in A- and B-grade embryos versus C-grade embryos and higher embryo utilization rates through the machine learning strategy compared with traditional niPGT-A analysis. Conclusion: A machine learning guided embryo grading system can be used to optimize embryo selection and avoid wastage of potential embryos.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?