Abstract:Purpose This paper aims to investigate a firm’s incentive to innovate its basic product to be socially responsible and its decision on the product line. By constructing a competition model, the paper examines the factors that affect the firm’s choice on its product line with the socially responsible innovation in the presence of altruistic consumers. Such factors include the proportion of the altruistic consumers, the firm’s coordination cost with the basic and innovative products, as well as the consumer’s transportation cost. Design/methodology/approach In a model of differentiated products with the competition, the author assumes that a portion of consumers has a strong preference for the socially responsible product (e.g. altruistic consumers). A firm is able to attract altruistic consumers with a socially responsible innovation but it may incur a coordination cost when both the basic and the innovated products are manufactured and sold. In a framework of a sequential game, the firms make a decision on the prices, innovation inputs, as well as the choice on its product line to achieve the expected profit maximization. Findings The firm has the incentive to engage in socially responsible innovation to better compete with its rivals. More importantly, the results of the paper explain why some firms wish to manufacture and sell the basic product even though the innovation is successful. The main factors that affect such a firm’s decision include the proportion of the altruistic consumers, the aggregate benefit to all the consumers who purchase the innovative product, the firm’s potential coordination cost and the consumer’s transportation cost. Originality/value The paper sheds light on a firm’s corporate social responsibility innovation and its product line determination. The results of this paper can be widely applied in the firm’s strategy of engaging in corporate social responsibility with eco-friendly elements that can attract altruistic consumers in the market. In addition, the findings of the paper can also contribute to policy formulation in terms of innovation. Such a result enables the policymakers to understand the factors that affect the firm’s motivation on innovation and helps them to better guide the firms efficiently participate in the research and development activities.

IS SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR FIRMS COMPETING ON QUANTITY EVOLUTIONARY STABLE?

Corporate Social Responsibility Development: An Analysis Based on Consumer-selection

Wholesale Pricing and Evolutionarily Stable Strategy in Duopoly Supply Chains with Social Responsibility

Evolution of Revenue Preference for Competing Firms with Nonlinear Inverse Demand

An Evolutionary Stable Strategy in a Duopolistic Market with Vertical Production Differentiation

Analysis On The Evolutionary Stability Of Enterprises Implementing Supply Chain Responsibility

Co-evolution of exploration-exploitation strategy and weak-strong ties portfolios: A longitudinal case study: Co-evolution of exploration-exploitation strategy and weak-strong ties portfolios: A longitudinal case study

Supply Chain Dynamics with Assortative Matching

Research on Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility View: from the Perspective of Integrative Social Contracts

Socially Responsible Newsvendor

Evolutionary Stability of Pricing Strategies in a Retail Market with Service

The Evolution of Differentiated Duopoly with Adaptive Strategies

Supply chain disruption management and evolutionarily stable strategies of retailers in the quantity-setting duopoly situation with homogeneous goods

Continuous Time Evolutionary Market Dynamics: the Case of Fix-Mix Strategies

Evolutionary Game Analysis of Social Responsibility in the Food Supply Chain Enterprises

Sustainable Strategies: Navigating Corporate Social Responsibility and Irresponsibility for Enlightened Self-Interest

EFFECT OF CSR ON PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION IN THE PRESENCE OF COST ADVANTAGE

Relation between Social Responsibility and Enterprise Long-term Competitiveness

Business Strategy and Corporate Social Responsibility

Steady-state analysis of social responsibility strategy of coal power enterprises from the perspective of game theory

Corporate Social Responsibility, Product Innovation, and Product Line