Prognostic value of interim 18F-PET/CT in patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

黄洪晖,肖菲,韩晓凤,朱坚轶,徐岚,刘佳,陈虞梅,施一平,朱照辉
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3781/j.issn.1000-7431.2016.33.980
2016-01-01
Tumori
Abstract:Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the prognostic value of interim 18F-FDG-PET/CT in patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).Methods: The data of 69 patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL treated with R-CHOP or CHOP regimen were retrospectively analyzed. All patients had a PET/CT scan at diagnosis (PET0) and an interim PET/CT after the third cycle of chemotherapy (PET3). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimal cut-off value of Δmaximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) (PET0-3). Pearson chi-square test, Kaplan–Meier method and COX proportional hazard model were performed to analyze the correlation of ΔSUVmax (PET0-3) with pretreatment clinical factors and its prognostic value in predicting efficacy, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).Results: The optimal cut-off value of ΔSUVmax (PET0-3) to predict disease progression in DLBCL patients was 80%. ΔSUVmax (PET0-3) between groups significantly differed with respect to serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), Ann Arbor stage and International Prognostic Index. Complete response rate and overall response rate were differed significantly between the ΔSUVmax (PET0-3) ≥ 80% and u003c 80% groups. ΔSUVmax (PET0-3) analysis (≥ 80% vs u003c 80%) identified patients with significantly different survival (3-year PFS: 86.5% vs 44.1%, P = 0.000; 3-year OS: 95.2% vs 68.6%, P = 0.004). Multivariate analysis revealed that ΔSUVmax (PET0-3) u003c 80% independently predicted PFS and OS (PFS: P = 0.000, hazard ratio: 8.301; OS: P = 0.016, hazard ratio: 7.191).Conclusion: Interim PET/CT using a ΔSUVmax-based criteria was associated with survival outcome and might be useful for risk stratification of patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL receiving first-line R-CHOP/CHOP therapy. DOI:10.3781/j.issn.1000-7431.2016.33.980
What problem does this paper attempt to address?