Prognostic value of maximum standard uptake on pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT scan in newly diagnosed diffuse large B cell lymphoma

Zhi-tao YING,Xue-juan WANG,Yu-qin SONG,Wen ZHENG,Xiao-pei WANG,Yan XIE,Ning-jing LIN,Mei-feng TU,Ling-yan PING,Wei-ping LIU,Li-juan DENG,Chen ZHANG,Zhi YANG,Jun ZHU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2012.46.003
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the prognostic value of maximum standard uptake (SUVmax) on pretreatment 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (18 F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan in patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL).Methods The clinical data of 39 DLBCL patients undergoing a PET/CT scan at pre-treatment from December 2009 to October 2011 were analyzed retrospectively.SUVmax on PET/CT was evaluated by SPSS 13.0 for the associations with patient characteristics,prognostic factors,treatment efficacy and survival time.Results The median SUVmax was higher in non-germinal center B cell-like (non-GCB) patients than that in GCB ones (18.0(2.2-40.5) vs 11.6 (5.3-18.7),P =0.039).No difference of SUVmax was observed between the patients with and without bulky disease (P =0.539).SUVmax was not associated with such patient characteristics as international protein index,age,stage,Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status,lactate dehydrogenase,number of extranodal invovlement and Ki-67 (all P >0.05).No significant difference in median SUVmax existed between complete remission (CR) and non-CR patients (P=0.312).The difference of SUVmax was insignificant for the patients with efficacy and no efficacy (P =0.243).With the cut-off values of 10,15,20,the CR rate,response rate,2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate and 2-year overall survival (OS) rate were not different between the patients with SUVmax below and above cut-off value (all P > 0.05).Conclusions The prognostic value of SUVmax on PET/CT is indeterminate.And it can not be used to predict the patient prognosis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?