Masamitsu Honma,Airi Kitazawa,Alex Cayley,Richard V Williams,Chris Barber,Thierry Hanser,Roustem Saiakhov,Suman Chakravarti,Glenn J Myatt,Kevin P Cross,Emilio Benfenati,Giuseppa Raitano,Ovanes Mekenyan,Petko Petkov,Cecilia Bossa,Romualdo Benigni,Chiara Laura Battistelli,Alessandro Giuliani,Olga Tcheremenskaia,Christine DeMeo,Ulf Norinder,Hiromi Koga,Ciloy Jose,Nina Jeliazkova,Nikolay Kochev,Vesselina Paskaleva,Chihae Yang,Pankaj R Daga,Robert D Clark,James Rathman

Abstract:The International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) M7 guideline allows the use of in silico approaches for predicting Ames mutagenicity for the initial assessment of impurities in pharmaceuticals. This is the first international guideline that addresses the use of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models in lieu of actual toxicological studies for human health assessment. Therefore, QSAR models for Ames mutagenicity now require higher predictive power for identifying mutagenic chemicals. To increase the predictive power of QSAR models, larger experimental datasets from reliable sources are required. The Division of Genetics and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Health Sciences (DGM/NIHS) of Japan recently established a unique proprietary Ames mutagenicity database containing 12140 new chemicals that have not been previously used for developing QSAR models. The DGM/NIHS provided this Ames database to QSAR vendors to validate and improve their QSAR tools. The Ames/QSAR International Challenge Project was initiated in 2014 with 12 QSAR vendors testing 17 QSAR tools against these compounds in three phases. We now present the final results. All tools were considerably improved by participation in this project. Most tools achieved >50% sensitivity (positive prediction among all Ames positives) and predictive power (accuracy) was as high as 80%, almost equivalent to the inter-laboratory reproducibility of Ames tests. To further increase the predictive power of QSAR tools, accumulation of additional Ames test data is required as well as re-evaluation of some previous Ames test results. Indeed, some Ames-positive or Ames-negative chemicals may have previously been incorrectly classified because of methodological weakness, resulting in false-positive or false-negative predictions by QSAR tools. These incorrect data hamper prediction and are a source of noise in the development of QSAR models. It is thus essential to establish a large benchmark database consisting only of well-validated Ames test results to build more accurate QSAR models.

Evaluation of Different Methods for Identification of Structural Alerts Using Chemical Ames Mutagenicity Data Set As a Benchmark.

Identification of Nontoxic Substructures: A New Strategy to Avoid Potential Toxicity Risk

Computational Approaches to Identify Structural Alerts and Their Applications in Environmental Toxicology and Drug Discovery.

Structure‐activity Relationship Approaches and Applications

In Silico Prediction of Chemical Ames Mutagenicity

Automating Knowledge Discovery for Toxicity Prediction Using Jumping Emerging Pattern Mining

In Silico Prediction of Chemical Genotoxicity Using Machine Learning Methods and Structural Alerts.

An assessment of mutagenicity of chemical substances by (quantitative) structure–activity relationship

In Silico Prediction Of Chemical Toxicity For Drug Design Using Machine Learning Methods And Structural Alerts

In Silicoestimation of Chemical Aquatic Toxicity on Crustaceans Using Chemical Category Methods

Chemical rules for optimization of chemical mutagenicity via matched molecular pairs analysis and machine learning methods

Identification of bioactive compounds with popular single-atom modifications: Comprehensive analysis and implications for compound design

Critical review on in silico methods for structural annotation of chemicals detected with LC/HRMS non-targeted screening

Predicting the Cytotoxicity of Chemicals Using Ensemble Learning Methods and Molecular Fingerprints

Improvement of quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) tools for predicting Ames mutagenicity: outcomes of the Ames/QSAR International Challenge Project

Deep active learning with high structural discriminability for molecular mutagenicity prediction

Prediction of molecular-specific mutagenic alerts and related mechanisms of chemicals by a convolutional neural network (CNN) model based on SMILES split

Computational Models to Predict Endocrine-Disrupting Chemical Binding with Androgen or Oestrogen Receptors.

Linking electron ionization mass spectra of organic chemicals to toxicity endpoints through machine learning and experimentation

In Silico Prediction of Chemical Acute Oral Toxicity Using Multi-Classification Methods

Text Mining-Based Suspect Screening for Aquatic Risk Assessment in the Big Data Era: Event-Driven Taxonomy Links Chemical Exposures and Hazards