Abstract:In this paper we report a successful application of machine learning approaches to the prediction of chemical carcinogenicity. Two different approaches, namely a support vector machine (SVM) and artificial neural network (ANN), were evaluated for predicting chemical carcinogenicity from molecular structure descriptors. A diverse set of 844 compounds, including 600 carcinogenic (CG+) and 244 noncarcinogenic (CG−) molecules, was used to estimate the accuracies of these approaches. The database was divided into two sets: the model construction set and the independent test set. Relevant molecular descriptors were selected by a hybrid feature selection method combining Fischer's score and Monte Carlo simulated annealing from a wide set of molecular descriptors, including physiochemical properties, constitutional, topological, and geometrical descriptors. The first model validation method was based a five-fold cross-validation method, in which the model construction set is split into five subsets. The five-fold cross-validation was used to select descriptors and optimise the model parameters by maximising the averaged overall accuracy. The final SVM model gave an averaged prediction accuracy of 90.7% for CG+ compounds, 81.6% for CG− compounds and 88.1% for the overall accuracy, while the corresponding ANN model provided an averaged prediction accuracy of 86.1% for CG+ compounds, 79.3% for CG− compounds and 84.2% for the overall accuracy. These results indicate that the hybrid feature selection method is very efficient and the selected descriptors are truly relevant to the carcinogenicity of compounds. Another model validation method, i.e. a hold-out method, was used to build the classification model using the selected descriptors and the optimised model parameters, in which the whole model construction set was used to build the classification model and the independent test set was used to test the predictive ability of the model. The SVM model gave a prediction accuracy of 87.6% for CG+ compounds, 79.1% for CG− compounds and 85.0% for the overall accuracy. The ANN model gave a prediction accuracy of 85.6% for CG+ compounds, 79.1% for CG− compounds and 83.6% for the overall accuracy. The results indicate that the built models are potentially useful for facilitating the prediction of chemical carcinogenicity of untested compounds.

Prediction of molecular-specific mutagenic alerts and related mechanisms of chemicals by a convolutional neural network (CNN) model based on SMILES split

In Silico Prediction of Chemical Ames Mutagenicity

AMPred-CNN: Ames mutagenicity prediction model based on convolutional neural networks

In Silico Toxicity Prediction by Support Vector Machine and SMILES Representation-Based String Kernel.

In Silico Prediction of Chemical Genotoxicity Using Machine Learning Methods and Structural Alerts.

Stacked ensemble\-based mutagenicity prediction model using multiple modalities with graph attention network

Advancing Adverse Drug Reaction Prediction with Deep Chemical Language Model for Drug Safety Evaluation

Deep active learning with high structural discriminability for molecular mutagenicity prediction

Molecular image-convolutional neural network (CNN) assisted QSAR models for predicting contaminant reactivity toward OH radicals: Transfer learning, data augmentation and model interpretation

A deep learning based multi-model approach for predicting drug-like chemical compound's toxicity

MutagenPred-GCNNs: A Graph Convolutional Neural Network-Based Classification Model for Mutagenicity Prediction with Data-Driven Molecular Fingerprints

Prediction of Chemical Carcinogenicity by Machine Learning Approaches.

Predicting Chemical Carcinogens Using a Hybrid Neural Network Deep Learning Method

A Deep Learning Based Multi-Model Approach for Predicting Drug-Like Chemical Compound’s Toxicity

Chemical toxicity prediction based on semi-supervised learning and graph convolutional neural network

Toxicity Detection in Drug Candidates using Simplified Molecular-Input Line-Entry System

A Deep Learning-Based Chemical System for QSAR Prediction

ADMET Evaluation in Drug Discovery. 18. Reliable Prediction of Chemical-Induced Urinary Tract Toxicity by Boosting Machine Learning Approaches

In Silico Prediction of Chemical Reproductive Toxicity Using Machine Learning

In silico prediction of ocular toxicity of compounds using explainable machine learning and deep learning approaches

In Silico Toxicity Prediction of Chemicals from EPA Toxicity Database by Kernel Fusion-Based Support Vector Machines