Abstract:We calculate the total galactic Shapiro delay to the Crab pulsar by including the contributions from the dark matter as well as baryonic matter along the line of sight. The total delay due to dark matter potential is about 3.4 days. For baryonic matter, we included the contributions from both the bulge and the disk, which are approximately 0.12 and 0.32 days respectively. The total delay from all the matter distribution is therefore 3.84 days. We also calculate the limit on violations of Weak equivalence principle by using observations of “nano-shot” giant pulses from the Crab pulsar with time-delay <0.4\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$<0.4$$\end{document} ns, as well as using time differences between radio and optical photons observed from this pulsar. Using the former, we obtain a limit on violation of Weak equivalence principle in terms of the PPN parameter Δγ<2.41×10-15\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\varDelta \gamma < 2.41\times 10^{-15}$$\end{document}. From the time-difference between simultaneous optical and radio observations, we get Δγ<1.54×10-9\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\varDelta \gamma < 1.54\times 10^{-9}$$\end{document}. We also point out differences in our calculation of Shapiro delay and that from two recent papers (Yang and Zhang, Phys Rev D 94(10):101501, 2016; Zhang and Gong, Astrophys J 837:134, 2017), which used the same observations to obtain a corresponding limit on Δγ\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\varDelta \gamma $$\end{document}.

New test of weak equivalence principle using polarized light from astrophysical events

A New Method to Test the Einstein's Weak Equivalence Principle

Constraining Einstein’s equivalence principle with multiwavelength polarized astrophysical sources

Testing Weak Equivalence Principle with Strongly Lensed Cosmic Transients

Consistent Constraints on the Equivalence Principle from localised Fast Radio Bursts

Upper limits on Einstein’s weak equivalence principle placed by uncertainties of dispersion measures of fast radio bursts

Test of Weak Equivalence Principle with the multi-band timing of the Crab Pulsar

Testing Einstein'S Weak Equivalence Principle With Gravitational Waves

Constraining violations of the weak equivalence principle Using CHIME FRBs

Testing Fundamental Physics with Astrophysical Transients

Multimessenger Tests of the Weak Equivalence Principle from GW170817 and Its Electromagnetic Counterparts

Astrometric Test of the Weak Equivalence Principle

Testing the Equivalence Principle and Lorentz Invariance with the PeV Neutrino from Blazar PKS B1424-418

Testing the Equivalence Principle and Lorentz Invariance with PeV Neutrinos from Blazar Flares.

Testing Einstein's weak equivalence principle with a 0.4-nanosecond giant pulse of the Crab pulsar

Testing the Weak Equivalence Principle using Optical and Near-Infrared Crab Pulses

Multimessenger Tests of Einstein's Weak Equivalence Principle and Lorentz Invariance with a High-Energy Neutrino from a Flaring Blazar

Relativistic Effects and GRB Polarization in Power-Law Evolution

Galactic Shapiro delay to the Crab pulsar and limit on weak equivalence principle violation

New test on the Einstein equivalence principle through the photon ring of black holes

Constraining Alternative Theories of Gravity Using Pulsar Timing Arrays