Abstract:Managers choose to spend corporate resources to purchase directors' and officers' liability insurance, which protects directors and officers from personal financial liability in lawsuits brought against the firm and its directors and officers. We investigate whether the amount of D&O insurance coverage chosen by managers of IPO firms, and the cost of that insurance, is related to post-IPO abnormal stock price performance. If managers of IPO firms are exploiting superior inside information in bringing their companies public when the expected offering price exceeds managers' private valuation estimate, we hypothesize that the amount of insurance coverage chosen will be related to the post-offering performance of the issuing firm's shares. We analyze a sample of 72 IPO firms that went public between 1992 and 1996 for which we have detailed proprietary information about the amount and cost of D&O liability insurance. Consistent with the hypothesis, we find a significant negative relation between the 3-year post-IPO stock price performance and the amount of insurance coverage in place at the IPO date. We also analyze the pricing of D&O insurance by the insurers. Insurers charge more for insurance purchases that are larger than would be predicted by observable business risk proxies. However, insurers pool all abnormal insurance purchases together in that they do not distinguish between those who buy abnormally large insurance based on anticipated poor performance and those who buy extra insurance for other reasons (e.g., abnormally high risk aversion). Insurers do, however, appear to charge more to firms that buy more insurance and are subsequently sued, indicating that insurers are able to identify and price abnormal litigation risk. We argue that, similar to insider securities transactions, D&O insurance decisions reveal the private information of managers. This provides some motivation to argue that disclosure of the details of D&O insurance decisions, as is required in some other countries, is valuable.

The Materiality of Directors' and Officers' Insurance Information: Case for Disclosure

Disclosure in insurance law: a comparative analysis

The impact of subscribing to directors' and officers' liability insurance on corporate financialization: Evidence from China

Corporate Social Responsibility and Directors' and Officers' Liability Risk: The Moderating Effect of Risk Environment and Growth Potential

Directors' and officers' liability insurance and carbon emissions

Navigating legal responsibilities in politically connected firms: Insights into the influence of directors' and officers' insurance on litigation risk

Directors' and officers' liability insurance, environmental regulation and firms' envi ronmental responsibility

Directors’ and Officers’ Liability Insurance: Evidence from Independent Directors’ Voting

Are required SEC proxy disclosures about the board’s role in risk oversight substantive?

Managerial Opportunism? Evidence from Directors' and Officers' Insurance Purchases

The effect of directors' and officers' liabilities insurance on corporate social responsibility evidence from China

Study on Directors' Liability for Information Disclosure in Regular Reports of Listed Companies

Directors’ and Officers’ Liability Insurance and Independent Directors’ Voting

Directors and officers liability insurance and the wealth effect of M&A announcements

Directors' and officers' liability insurance and corporate digital transformation

Directors' and officers' liability insurance and corporate environmental investment: empirical evidence from the most polluting Chinese listed firms

Directors’ and Officers’ Liability Insurance, Independent Director Behavior, and Governance Effect

What protects me also makes me behave: The role of directors' and officers' liability insurance on empire-building managers in China

To Disclose or Not to Disclose Climate-Change Risk in Form 10-K: Does Materiality Lie in the Eyes of the Beholder?

Political Connections and Directors' and Officers' Liability Insurance – Evidence from China

Recent Trends in Corporate Political Disclosure for a Sample of S&P 500 Firms: a New and Emerging Corporate Disclosure Area