Abstract:Corporate Governance plays a very important role in modern economy society.Therefore, Chinese Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) urges listed companies to set up governance mechanisms such as independent Director and Audit Committee to prevent from financial frauds in 2001.But are these mandatory governance mechanisms effective? Previous studies test the effectiveness of corporate governance mostly by the performance of the company.However, because of the factors that impact on company performance are not only manifold but in volute, and many of those are not controllable by the managers, it is not strange that conclusions are not consistent with each other.This paper uses financial reports restatement to test the effectiveness of corporate governance.Because the occurring of opportunism accounting errors is directly related to bad corporate governance, and usually the result of failure corporate governance, therefore, it is an important and feasible way to research the effectiveness of corporate governance via the restatement of financial report.In this paper we investigate associations between accounting restatements and corporate governance via a sample of 1147 listed-companies during the period of 2002-2006, which includes 880 annual accounting restatements from 465 companies.The restatements are caused by performance relative accounting errors.We find that accounting misstatements relative with performance are prevented by strong internal governance, such as the boards owned more outside directors and an audit committee that should oversee the accounting and financial reporting process on behalf of shareholders; and outside governance, such as a big private stockholders and a strong outside auditor from the 4 biggest international accounting companies.But after using paired sample, the testing results show that the effect of audit committee on governing accounting errors is endogenous, that is, it depends on the effectiveness of other corporate governance.We also find that the firms controlled directly by government or state owned enterprises (SOE) are more likely to occur accounting errors related with earnings, this may be the result of absence of ownership.Because the principle-agent relationship is more complex in firms controlled by SOE, managers are easier out of control, leading to more reporting errors.Robust tests show that the probability of occurring financial restatements with clear motivation like avoiding losses, avoiding special treatment (ST) or particular transfer treatment (PT), and "big bath" in SOE controlled firms is not bigger than that in other listed firms.Anymore, in order to improve the quality of financial information, reducing managers' opportunistic behaviors, it is needed for the listed firms controlled by government or SOE to establish effective corporate governance by forced enforcement.

Study on Directors' Liability for Information Disclosure in Regular Reports of Listed Companies

On The Criteria And Responsibility System Of Information Disclosure Of Listed Companies In Mainland China

The Status Quo Of And The Reflections On The Information Disclosure Of Listed Companies In China

Research on Information Disclosure Quality of Corporate Social Responsibility from Corporate Governance Perspective

On Independent Directors' Responsibilities and Restrictions of Listed Companies

Secretary of Board of Directors and Corporate Internal Information: Evidence from Chinese Stock Market

Does securities enforcement improve disclosure quality? An examination of Chinese listed companies' restatement activities

Administrative penalties and corporate CSR disclosure strategies

An Empirical Study on the Independent Director Proportion, Stock Price Information and Independent Director System Reform

Research on the Problems and Countermeasures of Accounting Information Disclosure in Listed Companies

Does CSR Information Disclosure Improve Investment Efficiency? The Moderating Role of Analyst Attention

Analysis of the Key Problems and the Reasons of Information Disclosure in China's Security Markets

Fraud, Enforcement Action, and the Role of Corporate Governance: Evidence from China

The Empirical Study on Disclosure Quality of Listed Companies in China

Research on the Quality of Accounting Information Disclosure of Listed Companies

Disclosure of internal control evaluation reports of Chinese enterprises: History, problems and strategies

Directors’and Officers’Liability Insurance,Institutional Environment and Corporate Governance-Based on the Earnings Management of Publicly Listed Companies in China

Ownership,Corporate Governance and Financial Restatement

Reconstruction of Independent Director's Rights and Responsibilities in China——From the Perspective of the Differences between Independent Director and Inside Director

Foreign directors and corporate social responsibility reporting in China: the moderating role of institutional pressures

Does the Secretary of the Board of Directors Duality Matter? Evidence from the New Requirement of Updating Listing Rules to Improve the Quality of Information Disclosure