Abstract:Previous studies have shown that people would like to sacrifice benefits to themselves in order to avoid inequitable outcomes, not only when they receive less than others (disadvantageous inequity aversion) but also when they receive more (advantageous inequity aversion). This feature is captured by the theory of inequity aversion. The present study was inspired by what appears to be asymmetry in the research paradigm toward advantageous inequity aversion. Specifically, studies that supported the existence of advantageous inequity aversion always relied on the paradigm in which participants can determine allocations. Thus, it is interesting to know what would occur if participants could not determine allocations or simply passed judgment on predetermined allocations. To address this, a behavioral experiment (N = 118) and a skin conductance response (SCR) experiment (N = 29) were adopted to compare participants' preferences for advantageous inequity directly when allocations were determined and when allocations were predetermined in an allocating task. In the determined condition, participants could divide by themselves a sum of money between themselves and a matched person, whereas in the predetermined condition, they could simply indicate their satisfaction with an equivalent program-generated allocation. It was found that, compared with those in the determined condition, participants in the predetermined condition behaved as if they liked the advantageous inequity and equity to the same degree (Experiment One) and that the SCRs elicited by advantageous inequity had no differences from those elicited by equity, suggesting that participants did not feel negatively toward advantageous inequity in this situation (Experiment Two). The present study provided mutual corroboration (behavioral and electrophysiological data) to document that advantageous inequity aversion may differ as a function of the individual's role in determining allocations, and it would disappear if individual cannot determine allocations.

The Rich Are Easily Offended by Unfairness: Wealth Triggers Spiteful Rejection of Unfair Offers

Income Gap, Materialism, and Attitude toward the Rich in Developing Countries

Diverging Effects of Clean Versus Dirty Money on Attitudes, Values, and Interpersonal Behavior.

Sharing losses and sharing gains: Increased demand for fairness under adversity

I deserve better outcomes: Self-esteem relates to stronger reactions to unfairness

Proposers' Economic Status Affects Behavioral and Neural Responses to Unfairness

Inequality Aversion or Reciprocity?——An Investigation of Two Kinds of Fairness in the Ultimatum Game

Advantageous Inequity Aversion Does Not Always Exist: the Role of Determining Allocations Modulates Preferences for Advantageous Inequity

Neural Responses to Unfairness and Fairness Depend on Self-Contribution to the Income.

Invisible inequality leads to punishing the poor and rewarding the rich

Deliberately ignoring inequality to avoid rejecting unfair offers

Increased Neural Responses to Unfairness in a Loss Context

Age differences of responders' decision-making in disadvantageous and advantageous inequality contexts in the ultimatum game: The role of social value orientation

Punishing the privileged: Selfish offers from high-status allocators elicit greater punishment from third-party arbitrators

Perceptions of having less in the U.S. but having more in China are associated with stronger inequality aversion

Low social status decreases the neural salience of unfairness

Uncertainty Reduces Rejections of Unfair Offers in the Ultimatum Game

Victim Sensitivity and Proposal Size Modulate the Ingroup Favoritism During Fairness Norm Enforcement

Rejection of Unfair Offers Can Be Driven by Negative Emotions, Evidence from Modified Ultimatum Games with Anonymity.

Which is More Important, Proposer Identity or Allocation Motive? Event-Related Potential in Economic Decision-Making

When Do Low Status Individuals Accept Less? The Interaction between Self- and Other-Status during Resource Distribution