Abstract:Objective: Autonomous vehicles (Avs) have paved the way for the arrangement of swivel seats in vehicles, which could pose a challenge to traditional safety systems. The integration of automated emergency braking (AEB) and pre-pretension (PPT) seatbelts improves protection for a vehicle's occupant. The objective of this study is to explore the control strategies of an integrated safety system for swiveled seating orientations. Methods: Occupant restraints were examined in various seating configurations using a single-seat model with a seat-mounted seatbelt. Seat orientation was set at different angles, from -45° to 45° with 15° increments. A pretension was used on the shoulder belt to represent an active belt force cooperating with AEB. A generic full frontal vehicle pulse of 20 mph was applied to the sled. The occupant's kinematics response under various integrated safety system control strategies was analyzed by extracting a head pre-crash kinematics envelope. The injury values were calculated for various seating directions with or without an integrated safety system at the collision speed of 20 mph. Results: In a lateral movement, the excursions of the dummy head were 100 mm and 70 mm in the global coordinate system for negative and positive seat orientations, respectively. In the axial movement, the head traveled 150 mm and 180 mm in the global coordinate system for positive and negative seating directions, respectively. The 3-point seatbelt did not restrain the occupant symmetrically. The occupant experienced greater y-axis excursion and smaller x-axis excursion in the negative seat position. Various integrated safety system control strategies led to significant differences in head movement in the y direction. The integrated safety system reduced the occupant's potential injury risks in different seating positions. When the AEB and PPT were activated, the absolute HIC15, brain injury criteria (BrIC), neck injury (Nij), and chest deflection were reduced in most seating directions. However, the pre-crash increased the injury risks at some seating positions. Conclusion: The pre-pretension seatbelt could reduce the occupant's forward movement in the rotating seat positions in a pre-crash period. The occupant's pre-crash motion envelope was generated, which could be beneficial to future restraint systems and vehicle interior design. The integrated safety system could reduce injuries in different seating orientations.

Protection Performance Simulation and Anchoring Optimization of Seat Safety Belts of Vehicle under Vertical Intensive Shock

Research on the Protection Strategy of Pretensioner Seat-belt with the Active Braking Technology

Optimization Design of Anchorage Structure for Safety Belt on Rear Floor

Investigation of Risk Factors Affecting Injuries in Reclining Seat under Frontal Impact

Analysis and Improvement for the Failure of Seat Belt Anchor of a Car Based on Simulation and Experiment

Effects of an integrated safety system for swivel seat arrangements in frontal crash

Multi-Parameter and Multi-Objective Optimization of Occupant Restraint System in Frontal Collision

The Safety of Body Structure and Occupant Protection Research of Medium Bus Under Three Kinds of Frontal Impact Forms

Factors Influencing Injury Risk and Submarining Tendency of Child Occupant

Development and Optimization of a New Occupant Restraint System for Improving Mini Vehicle Safety

Protecting occupant in autonomous vehicle accident with rotating seat and belt airbag

Study on the Influence of Seat Adjustment on Occupant Head Injury Based on Madymo

Study of AEB and active seat belt on driver injury in vehicle-vehicle frontal oblique crash

Analysis and Test of Shock Response of an Anti-impact Chair

Safety Benefits of Belt Pretensioning in Conjunction with Precrash Braking in a Frontal Crash

Effect of rear-seat submarine on dummy injury and it’s optimization

Comparison between Two Typical Seat Occupant Protection Systems

Does unbelted safety requirement affect protection for belted occupants?

Analysis and Improvement for Key Parts of Car Based on Frontal Crashworthiness Simulation

Numerical parametric study on factors affecting passenger safety in motorcoach frontal collision

Pelvis and thoracolumbar spine response in simulated under-body blast impacts and protective seat cushion design