Abstract:Aim/Background: BSA dosing leads to great inter-individual DTX PK variability, which is a major contributor for severe toxicity, especially in East-Asian populations. DTX exposure measured by area under plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) could positively predict DTX related neutropenia. We conducted a randomized clinical trial to assess the value of PK-guided DTX dosing on relieving toxicity.Methods: To date, 99 Asian advanced NSCLC patients were randomly assigned to receive single agent 3-weekly DTX chemotherapy for up to 6 cycles, either at a fixed standard dose of 75 mg/m2 by BSA (arm1) or at a PK-guided dose (arm2) with a same starting dose. AUC is calculated from a published PK model. Dose of subsequent cycles of arm2 patients is calculated base on previous cycle, according to optimal AUC target (2.5–3.7 µg•h/mL) algorithm. Dose reductions were permitted in both arms for toxicities. The study had a power of 80% to detect a 23% reduction of grade >3 neutropenia with PK-guided arm.Results: Patients' major characteristics were male (62.6%), non-smoker (58.6%), ECOG 0 (80.8%) and adenocarcinoma (74.7%). 1st cycle of dosing 75 mg/m2 for all patients show 11 folds of PK variability, with mean AUC of 4.53 (range 1.8-20.3, CV = 56%), only 29.2% were in the target. Major patients (59.4%) were over exposed to DTX, experienced 18.5% higher of grade ≥3 neutropenia incidence. PK-guided dosing strategy could significantly reduce the dose of DTX, with a reduction of 8.6 mg/m2 (64.4 vs. 73.0, p < 0.001) in 2nd to 6th cycles. Patients therefore experienced 25.4% lower of grade ≥3 neutropenia incidence in PK-guided dose arm (47.5% vs. 72.9%, p = 0.002). Overall response rate showed no differences between arm2 and arm1 (20.0% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.769), so is progression free survival (4.6 vs. 3.4 months, p = 0.567).Conclusions: Majority of East-Asian NSCLC patients were over-exposed to DTX at a dose of 75 mg/m2. PK-guided dosing strategy could reduce DTX related neutropenia without efficacy damage.Clinical trial identification: NCT01891123Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest. Aim/Background: BSA dosing leads to great inter-individual DTX PK variability, which is a major contributor for severe toxicity, especially in East-Asian populations. DTX exposure measured by area under plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) could positively predict DTX related neutropenia. We conducted a randomized clinical trial to assess the value of PK-guided DTX dosing on relieving toxicity. Methods: To date, 99 Asian advanced NSCLC patients were randomly assigned to receive single agent 3-weekly DTX chemotherapy for up to 6 cycles, either at a fixed standard dose of 75 mg/m2 by BSA (arm1) or at a PK-guided dose (arm2) with a same starting dose. AUC is calculated from a published PK model. Dose of subsequent cycles of arm2 patients is calculated base on previous cycle, according to optimal AUC target (2.5–3.7 µg•h/mL) algorithm. Dose reductions were permitted in both arms for toxicities. The study had a power of 80% to detect a 23% reduction of grade >3 neutropenia with PK-guided arm. Results: Patients' major characteristics were male (62.6%), non-smoker (58.6%), ECOG 0 (80.8%) and adenocarcinoma (74.7%). 1st cycle of dosing 75 mg/m2 for all patients show 11 folds of PK variability, with mean AUC of 4.53 (range 1.8-20.3, CV = 56%), only 29.2% were in the target. Major patients (59.4%) were over exposed to DTX, experienced 18.5% higher of grade ≥3 neutropenia incidence. PK-guided dosing strategy could significantly reduce the dose of DTX, with a reduction of 8.6 mg/m2 (64.4 vs. 73.0, p < 0.001) in 2nd to 6th cycles. Patients therefore experienced 25.4% lower of grade ≥3 neutropenia incidence in PK-guided dose arm (47.5% vs. 72.9%, p = 0.002). Overall response rate showed no differences between arm2 and arm1 (20.0% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.769), so is progression free survival (4.6 vs. 3.4 months, p = 0.567). Conclusions: Majority of East-Asian NSCLC patients were over-exposed to DTX at a dose of 75 mg/m2. PK-guided dosing strategy could reduce DTX related neutropenia without efficacy damage. Clinical trial identification: NCT01891123 Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Is Vinorelbine Pharmacokinetics Modified in Asian Patients when Compared to Caucasian Patients?

Effect of Ethnicity on Vinorelbine Pharmacokinetics: a Population Pharmacokinetics Analysis

A Randomised, Multicentre Open-Label Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Oral Vinorelbine Plus Cisplatin Versus Intravenous Vinorelbine Plus Cisplatin in Chinese Patients with Chemotherapy-Naive Unresectable or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Oral Vinorelbine Versus Intravenous Vinorelbine, in Combination with Epirubicin As First-Line Chemotherapy in Chinese Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer

A Systematic Review of Vinorelbine for the Treatment of Breast Cancer.

Oral versus intravenous vinorelbine: clinical safety profile

Pharmacokinetic Behavior of Vincristine and Safety Following Intravenous Administration of Vincristine Sulfate Liposome Injection in Chinese Patients With Malignant Lymphoma

Novel SLC22A16 Polymorphisms and Influence on Doxorubicin Pharmacokinetics in Asian Breast Cancer Patients

Efficacy, Safety And Pharmacokinetics Of Subcutaneous Azacitidine In Chinese Patients With Higher Riskmyelodysplastic Syndromes: Results From Amulticenter, Single-Arm, Open-Label Phase 2 Study

Individualized Treatment with Voriconazole in the Chinese Population: Inflammation Level As a Novel Marker for Dose Optimization.

Abstract P1-16-02: A randomized phase II study investigating oral metronomic vinorelbine versus conventional dosage of vinorelbine in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline or taxane:clinical results and biomarker analysis

Pharmacogenetic Profiling Across the Doxorubicin Pathway in Asian Breast Cancer Patients

P5-19-07: the Effects of ABCC2 and SLCO1B3 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms on Docetaxel-Induced Leukopenia in Breast Cancer Patients.

424PD Individualization of docetaxel (DTX) treatment in East-Asian advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients based on pharmacokinetically (PK)-guided dosing strategy: an open-label randomized clinical trial

Ethnic sensitivity assessment: Polatuzumab vedotin pharmacokinetics in Asian and non-Asian patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in POLARIX

Abstract 2801: Pharmacokinetic modeling of Vincristine and its metabolite in Kenyan pediatric cancer patients

Hepatic Expression of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 Genes in Asians and Implications for Pharmacokinetic Variations During Chemotherapy

Retrospective Analysis of 119 Chinese Noninflammatory Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Cases Treated with Intravenous Combination of Vinorelbine and Epirubicin As a Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: a Median Follow-Up of 63.4 Months.

Rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics in Caucasian and Asian subjects residing in the United States

Vinorelbine Alters lncRNA Expression in Association with EGFR Mutational Status and Potentiates Tumor Progression Depending on NSCLC Cell Lines’ Genetic Profile

Abstract LB126: Population and Non-Compartmental Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Ripretinib and Its Active Metabolite in Chinese Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor