Efficacy And Cns Progression Analysis From The Randomized Phase 2 Trial Of Neratinib Plus Paclitaxel Vs Trastuzumab Plus Paclitaxel As First-Line Treatment For Her2+Metastatic Breast Cancer (Nefertt)

Ahmad Awada,Ramon Colomer,Igor Bondarenko,Kenichi Inoue,Rajendra A. Badwe,Georgia Demetriou,Xiaojia Wang,Vitaly Smirnov,Soo-Chin Lee,Ajay O. Mehta,Sung-Bae Kim,Zhen-Zhou Shen,Thomas Denis Bachelot,Chanchal Goswami,S. V. S. Deo,Ron Bose,Alvin Wong,Feng Xu,Richard Bryce,Lisa A. Carey
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.610
IF: 45.3
2015-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:610 Background: This large randomized open-label phase 2 trial compared the efficacy and safety of Neratinib (N), the irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor, + Paclitaxel (P) vs Trastuzumab (T) + P as first-line treatment in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: 479 pts were enrolled between 08/2009 and 08/2011. Women ≥18y with locally recurrent or MBC, HER2 gene amplification/HER2 overexpression, no progression within 12m (neo)adjuvant therapy, and no prior treatment for advanced disease were eligible. Pts were randomized to oral N (240mg od) + P or T+P. Dosing: T 4mg/kg iv then 2mg/kg iv weekly, P 80mg/m2 iv weekly 3/4w. Primary endpoint: progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints: overall survival (OS); overall response rate (ORR); duration of response; clinical benefit rate; CNS progression; safety. PFS analysis was ITT by stratified log-rank test. Randomization was stratified by region, prior T, prior lapatinib, ER/PR status. 304 PFS events were required to detect 30% impro...
What problem does this paper attempt to address?