Efficacy And Safety Analysis Of Trastuzumab And Paclitaxel Based Regimen Plus Carboplatin Or Epirubicin As Neoadjuvant Therapy For Clinical Stage Ii-Iii, Her2-Positive Breast Cancer Patients: A Phase 2, Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized Trial

Liang Huang,Sheng Chen,Wentao Yang,Binghe Xu,Tao Huang,Hongjian Yang,Hong Zheng,Yongsheng Wang,Erwei Song,Jin Zhang,Shude Cui,Da Pang,Lili Tang,Yutao Lei,Cuizhi Geng,Zhiming Shao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.4337
2015-01-01
Oncotarget
Abstract:This trial was designed to compare the efficacy and safety between epirubicin (E) and carboplatin (C) in combination with paclitaxel (P) and trastuzumab (H) in neoadjuvant setting. In 13 Chinese cancer centers, 100 patients with HER2-positive, locally advanced breast cancer were 1: 1 randomized to receive medication as follows: trastuzumab and paclitaxel weekly combined with carboplatin weekly for PCH group, or epirubicin every 3 weeks for PEH group. Patients were given 4 to 6 cycles of chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, which was no significant difference in PCH and PEH regimen (39.1% vs. 48.8%; p=0.365). However, PEH regimen achieved higher pCR in luminal-B (HER2-poitive) subgroup (55.0% vs. 24.0%; p=0.033), but not in ERBB2+ subgroup (42.9% vs. 57.1%; p=0.355). PEH regimen showed a favorable efficacy in PIK3CA mutated subgroup (69.2% vs. 23.5%, p=0.012). No significant difference was observed in the subgroup analysis of TP53 mutation status, PTEN expression, FCGR2A SNP and FCGR3A SNP. Both regimens as neoadjuvant chemotherapy achieve similar efficacy and safety. PEH might improve pCR rate, especially in the luminal-B subtype and PIK3CA mutation subtype. PEH is feasible and less likely to increase the incidence of acute cardiac events compared to PCH.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?