Abstract:Objective The widely use of ultrasound elastography has increased the detection rate of breast cancer.It has great advantage of differential diagnosis of breast tumor.Our study is to evaluate and compare the value of the quantitative ultrasound elastography parameters of AR ( area ratio) , ESR ( entire strain ratio) , LSR ( locolized strain ratio) , EFLR( entire fat to lesion ratio) and LFLR( locolized fat to lesion ratio) in the differential diagnosis of breast tumor. Methods 110 patients with 113 breast tumors were collected from Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Region between January 2015 and January 2016 who underwent breast exami-nation.The tumors were divided into two groups according to patholo-gy which acts as gold standard:benign group with 59 lesions and ma-lignant group with 54 lesions.Participants underwent quantitative ul-trasound elastography parameters examination.AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR、LFLR were compared between benign group and malignant group and ROC curve was drawn.Conventional ultrasound and ultrasound elastography parameter are combined to differentiate the benign or malignant lesion.Calculate the various parameters on the accuracy、susceptibility、specificity、positive likelihood ratio、negative likeli-hood ratio of the diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions, and determine the quantitative parameter with the highest accuracy. Results The mean value of AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR and LFLR of malignant lesions were all significantly greater than that of benign le-sions (P=0.000).Compared with the conventional ultrasound, AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR and LFLR have higher AUC in the differentia-tion of benign and malignant breast lesions;AUC of AR and ESR are higher than conventional ultrasound、LSR、EFLR and LFLR( P<0.000).Compared with conventional ultrasound(1.523) alone, conventional ultrasound combined separately with AR、ESR、EFLR and LFLR have higher positive likelihood ratio(11.581、8.272、3.482、2.458、2.100) in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions, so as accuracy、susceptibility、specificity(P<0.000).The AUC of conventional ultrasound combined separately with AR and ESR[0.940(0.890~0.990)、0.941(0.891~0.990)] were higher than conventional ultrasound and conventional ultrasound com-bined separately with LSR、EFLR、LFLR[0.669(0.669~0.768)、0.837(0.759~0.915)、0.763(0.673~0.852)、0.787(0.701~0.874)],so as accuracy、susceptibility、specificity and positive likelihood ratio(P<0.000). Conclusion Quantitative ultrasound elastography may be helpful in differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions, especially combining conventional ultrasound with AR and ESR, which were superior to combining with the other parameters and provide a more objective and credible basis to differenti-ate benign and malignant breast tumors with conventional ultrasound.

Ultrasound Strain Elastography for Breast Lesions: Computer-Aided Evaluation With Quantifiable Elastographic Features

Evaluation Stiff Rim Sign in Breast Lesions by Shear Wave Elastography with Quantative Values

Value of Scoring by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Combined with Ultrasonic Elastography in Differential Diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 Lesions

Complex cystic and solid breast lesions: diagnostic performance of conventional ultrasound, strain imaging and point shear wave speed measurement.

Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging and Quantification: Value in Malignancy Prediction for Complex Cystic and Solid Breast Lesions

Added Value of a New Strain Elastography Technique in Conventional Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Breast Masses: A Prospective Multicenter Study

The differentiation of malignant and benign lesions of the breast by quantitative Ultrasound elastography

Quantitative Evaluation of Peripheral Tissue Elasticity for Ultrasound-Detected Breast Lesions.

Clinical use and adjustment of ultrasound elastography for breast lesions followed WFUMB guidelines and recommendations in the real world

Three-dimensional Shear Wave Elastography for Differentiation of Breast Lesions: an Initial Study with Quantitative Analysis Using Three Orthogonal Planes

Breast Elasticity Imaging Techniques: Comparison of Strain Elastography and Shear-Wave Elastography in the Same Population

Computer-assisted assessment of ultrasound real-time elastography: initial experience in 145 breast lesions.

Diagnostic value of strain elastography and shear wave elastography in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions

Evaluation of shear wave elastography for differential diagnosis of breast lesions: A new qualitative analysis versus conventional quantitative analysis.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Synchronized with Shear Wave Elastography in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions: a Diagnostic Test

Computer-aided diagnosis based on quantitative elastographic features with supersonic shear wave imaging.

Two-dimensional shear wave elastography with two different systems for the diagnosis of breast lesions

Ultrasound strain elastography to improve diagnostic performance of breast lesions by reclassifying BI-RADS 3 and 4a lesions: a multicenter diagnostic study

Can Ultrasound Elastography Help Better Manage Mammographic BI-RADS Category 4 Breast Lesions?

Semi-quantitating Stiffness of Breast Solid Lesions in Ultrasonic Elastography

Quantitative Features and Diagnostic Value of 3-Dimensional Shear Wave Elastography in Breast Lesions