Modified Folfox6 As The First-Line Chemotherapy For Metastatic Duodenal Carcinoma

Min Dong,Xiang-Bo Wan,Xiao-Nan Li,Xiang-yuan Wu,Qu Lin,Jin-Yun Wen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.e14512
IF: 45.3
2011-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:e14512 Background: Duodenal carcinoma, that with a rare incurrence, displayed a poor prognosis in the metastatic settings. The clinical trial based therapeutic regimen for advanced duodenal carcinoma was however limited. At the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) regimen was used as the first-line treatment for most of the patients with metastatic duodenal carcinoma. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of mFOLFOX6 for metastatic duodenal carcinoma. Methods: Twelve patients with metastatic duodenal carcinoma, who had received mFOLFOX6 regimen as the first-line treatment between February 2007 and January 2010, were included in this study. The mFOLFOX6 regimen was administered as a two-week cycle with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 1, calcium folinate 400mg/m2 as a 2h infusion followed by bolus 5-fluorouracil 400mg/m2 and a 46h infusion of 5-fluorouracil 2,400mg/m2. The primary outcomes were overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). Results: These 12 patients received mFOLFOX6 regimen for 2-7 cycles (median, 4 cycles).Three patients(25%) achieved partial response, compared with another three patients (25%) obtained stable disease for 2-4 months (median, 3 months ). The rest of 6 patients (50%) developed disease progression. The ORR and the disease control rate (DCR) were 25% and 50%, respectively. The median time to progression (TTP) was 4 months (range, 1-19 months) and the median OS was 16 months (range, 4-39 months). The 1-year and 2-year survival rate were 67% (8/12) and 17% (2/12), respectively. Three patients had grade 3 toxicities, including anemia, diarrhea and peripheral neuropathy, and no patient presented grade 4 toxicities. Conclusions: The mFOLFOX6 regimen displayed a certain efficacy and well tolerance as the first-line treatment in metastatic duodenal carcinoma, providing a potential therapeutic selection for future clinical trial and practice.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?