A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial of Mfolfox6 with or Without Radiation in Neoadjuvant Treatment of Local Advanced Rectal Cancer (FOWARC Study): Preliminary Results.

Yanhong Deng,Pan Chi,Ping Lan,Lei Wang,Long Cui,Daoda Chen,Jie Cao,Hongbo Wei,Xiang Peng,Zonghai Huang,Guangfu Cai,Ren Zhao,Zhongcheng Huang,Yiding Luo,Yuxin Zhang,Yue Cai,Jianping Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.3500
IF: 45.3
2015-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:3500 Background: The FOWARC study investigates whether peri-operative mFOLFOX6 chemotherapy (CT) improves disease-free survival (DFS) in locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods: Between 01/2011-02/2015, patients with rectal cancer within 12 cm from the anal verge, clinical stage II-III were randomly assigned to received 5-FU with radiation(RT) (control arm), or receive mFOLFOX6 with RT (FOLFOX-RT arm), or receive 4-6 cycles of mFOLFOX6 alone (FOLFOX arm), post-operative RT is allowed if needed. Primary endpoint is DFS. Here we report the preliminary results. Results: 495 patients were randomized (165 in each arm). 92% of patients accomplished at least 46 Gy of RT in FOLFOX-RT arm compared to 86.8% in control arm. 5% of FOLFOX arm patients received post-op RT. R0 resection rate was 90.1%, 88.2%, and 91.2%, respectively in control arm, FOLFOX-RT arm and FOLFOX arm. The pCR rate was 12.5%, 31.3% and 7.4% respectively (P = 0.001). Good down staging (ypTNM 0-1) was achieved in 34.7%, 57.8%, and 37.9% of patients respectively. Higher toxicity and post-op complications were observed in patients received RT. Similar results were seen in subgroup of patients with lesions located within 5cm from the anal verge. Conclusions: mFOLFOX6 concurrent with RT resulted in higher pCR rate, neoadjuvant mFOLFOX6 alone achieved similar down staging rate with less toxicity and post-op complications, compared to preoperative 5-FU with RT. Clinical trial information: NCT01211210. All patients Subgroup(0-5cm) Control FOLFOX-RT FOLFOX Control FOLFOX-RT FOLFOX Age Median(Range) 56.2(24-75) 52.0(27-73) 56.0(21-75) 56.2(24-75) 52.6(30-72) 56(28-73) Clinical T4b(%) 8.6 8.6 3.0 11.1 8 4.8 Clinical staging III (%) 76.5 75 70.3 67.9 66.7 51.3 pCR(%) 12.5 31.3 7.4 14.3 43.2 8.8 ypTNM 0-I(%) 34.7 57.8 37.9 33.3 62.1 41.2 TRG 0-1(%) 33.2 65.6 38.5 33.3 52 26.1 R0 resection (%) 90.1 88.2 91.2 72.2 74 76.2 Sphincter preservation (%) 76.5 82.8 88.2 59.3 62 66.7 Grade 3/4 Leucopenia(%) 14.8 20.9 7.9 15.1 14.6 15.8 Grade 3/4 radiodermatitis(%) 13.6 20.0 - 17 20.8 - Grade 3/4 radiation proctitis(%) 9.8 13.2 - 13.1 10.4 - Anastomotic leakage(%) 24.3 18.8 6.3 20 18.4 3 Infection of incision (%) 25.7 29.9 9.5 30.8 39.5 9.1
What problem does this paper attempt to address?