Abstract:Abstract Humans are capable of integrating social contextual information into decision-making processes to adjust their attitudes towards inequity. This context-dependency emerges both when individual is better off (i.e. advantageous inequity) and worse off (i.e. disadvantageous inequity) than others. It is not clear however, whether the context-dependent processing of advantageous and disadvantageous inequity rely on dissociable or shared neural mechanisms. Here, by combining an interpersonal interactive game that gave rise to interpersonal guilt and different versions of the dictator games that enabled us to characterize individual weights on aversion to advantageous and disadvantageous inequity, we investigated the neural mechanisms underlying the two forms of inequity aversion in the interpersonal guilt context. In each round, participants played a dot-estimation task with an anonymous co-player. The co-players received pain stimulation with 50% probability when anyone responded incorrectly. At the end of each round, participants completed a dictator game, which determined payoffs of him/herself and the co-player. Both computational model-based and model-free analyses demonstrated that when inflicting pain upon co-players (i.e., the guilt context), participants cared more about advantageous inequity and became less sensitive to disadvantageous inequity, compared with other social contexts. The contextual effects on two forms of inequity aversion are uncorrelated with each other at the behavioral level. Neuroimaging results revealed that the context-dependent representation of inequity aversion exhibited a spatial gradient in activity within the insula, with anterior parts predominantly involved in the aversion to advantageous inequity and posterior parts predominantly involved in the aversion to disadvantageous inequity. The dissociable mechanisms underlying the two forms of inequity aversion are further supported by the involvement of right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex in advantageous inequity processing, and the involvement of right amygdala and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex in disadvantageous inequity processing. These results extended our understanding of decision-making processes involving inequity and the social functions of inequity aversion.

Anterior insula signals inequalities in a modified Ultimatum Game

Whether others were treated equally affects neural responses to unfairness in the Ultimatum Game.

Social Support Modulates Neural Responses to Unfairness in the Ultimatum Game.

How is the AI Perceived when It Behaves (Un)fairly?

Neural Responses to Unfairness and Fairness Depend on Self-Contribution to the Income.

Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: An ERP study

Inequality Aversion or Reciprocity?——An Investigation of Two Kinds of Fairness in the Ultimatum Game

Gender Differences in Behavioral and Neural Responses to Unfairness Under Social Pressure

Power to Punish Norm Violations Affects the Neural Processes of Fairness-Related Decision Making

Neural Correlates of Decision Making after Unfair Treatment.

Equal Status in Ultimatum Games Promotes Rational Sharing

The Neural Correlate of Mid-Value Offers in Ultimatum Game

The Role of the Anterior Insula in Social Norm Compliance and Enforcement: Evidence from Coordinate-Based and Functional Connectivity Meta-Analyses.

Social comparisons differentially affect fair and unfair processing in ultimatum bargaining

Proposers' Economic Status Affects Behavioral and Neural Responses to Unfairness

Social status modulates the neural response to unfairness

Spatial gradient in activity within the insula reflects dissociable neural mechanisms underlying context-dependent advantageous and disadvantageous inequity aversion

Counterfactual Comparison Modulates Fairness Consideration in the Mini-Ultimatum Game: an Event-Related Potentials Study.

Increased Neural Responses to Unfairness in a Loss Context

Counterfactual comparison modulates fairness consideration in the mini‐ultimatum game: An event‐related potentials study

The Critical Role of the Right Dorsal and Ventral Anterior Insula in Reciprocity: Evidence from the Trust and Ultimatum Games