Abstract:PurposeThis paper aims to study how state ownership influences the innovation process in terms of allocating resources toward searching for new solutions and converting these efforts into economic value. On one hand, deep pockets of the state provide slack resources that may facilitate risk taking and innovation. On the other hand, soft budgets can create incentive problems and dampen the efficient use of resources. The authors suggest how accounting for competitive context can disentangle these countervailing forces.Design/methodology/approachThe authors use a panel of over 240,000 Chinese firms over the years 2004–2008. The broad sample and period afforded substantial variability in terms of state ownership within and across firms. The authors use a two-stage model and a within-firm (i.e. fixed-effects) design, controlling for all time-invariant firm characteristics and the problematic unobserved heterogeneity that can often lead to erroneous inferences. Furthermore, the relatively short window limits the likelihood of time-varying unobserved firm characteristics biasing the empirical results.FindingsThe authors found that private-sector competition has the opposite effect on the relationship between state ownership and the second step of the innovation process. In industries where there is robust private-sector competition, state ownership diminishes the firm’s ability to convert R&D efforts into economic value. Private-sector competition competes away any advantages state-owned firms may have in terms of developing or accessing the complementary resources needed for commercialization. Ultimately, the inefficiencies of state ownership in terms of relatively undisciplined selection and monitoring of R&D activities outweigh any potential resource advantages derived from state ownership.Originality/valueThe state remains a prominent player in many economies throughout the world. The authors explored how state ownership of firms influences the resources they expend in searching out new solutions, and their success in converting such resources into economically valuable new products and services. State ownership has potentially countervailing effects on innovation. The authors disentangle these countervailing effects through consideration of how accounting for competitive context could determine whether the beneficial effects of state ownership dominate its detrimental effects for both searching for new solutions and converting these efforts into economically valuable new products. With a focus of market competition as an external force that drives the difference in innovation between SOEs and the private-sector, this study serves as a parallel effort to Jiaet al.(2019) who investigate the joint effect of public and corporate governance on SOEs’ innovation performance, and Zhouet al.(2017) who concern the balance of the institution and efficiency logics on the comparative advantage of SOEs over privately owned enterprises in innovation performance.

Enforceability of Noncompetition Agreements and Firm Innovation: Does State Regulation Matter?

The Effects of Corporate Governance on Innovation in Chinese Firms ∗

Does Property Rights Protection Affect Firm Innovation? Evidence from the Chinese Property Rights Law Enactment

Firm Innovation and Covenant Tightness

Labor Contract Law and inventor mobility: evidence from China

Enforceability of Non-Compete Covenants, Discretionary Investments, and Financial Reporting Practices: Evidence from a Natural Experiment

Land Regulations, Innovation and Productivity: Firm‐level Evidence from China

Do Stronger Patents Stimulate or Stifle Innovation? the Crucial Role of Financial Development

Does Workforce Diversity Pay? Evidence from Corporate Innovation

State Ownership and Corporate Innovation Efficiency

Does Workplace Discrimination Impede Innovation

Do Individuals or Firms Matter More? the Case of Patent Generation

Does Banking Competition Affect Innovation?

Labor cost, government intervention, and corporate innovation: Evidence from China

State Ownership, Firm Innovation and the Moderating Role of Private-Sector Competition: the Case of China

Pay Discrimination and Innovation Productivity: Evidence from the Passage of State-Level Pay Secrecy Laws

Providing Protection or Encouraging Holdup? the Effects of Labor Unions on Innovation

Policy Certainty and Heterogeneous Firm Innovation: Evidence from a Developing Country

Patent Regime Shift and Firm Innovation: Evidence from the Second Amendment to China’s Patent Law

Power of Competition: Unraveling the Impact of China's Fair Competition Review System Implementation on Firm Innovation