Tournament or Career Concern?An Empirical Research on Risk Taking of Chinese Fund Managers
RAO Yu-lei,WANG Ying,DAI Peng-jun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-6062.2013.02.009
2013-01-01
Abstract:From the perspective of Career Concerns,this paper considers the relative ranking of previous performance of various funds and their impact on the portfolio risk taken by fund managers at a later stage.Many researchers have noted such effect and suggest that the relationships between the two through the tournament theory exist and fund managers who rank lower choose higher risks afterwards.However,related researches of this theory have failed to reach consistent conclusions.Fund managers in China have been facing a high risk in their career life due to frequent turnover.Poor performance can easily lead to unemployment.Therefore,based on the Career Concerns theory,this paper explains fund managers' risk-taking behavior in terms of intrinsic motivations.While mid-level managers are being relatively risk averse,we believe that those concerns over the professional life will lead people,both managers with higher or lower rankings in the beginning,to take a high risk in next phases.To verify the effect of managers' career concerns on the risk-taking portfolio,we estimate the probability of negative employment status of managers by selecting Chinese open equity funds from 2004 to 2009 and employing the Logit model to measure their career concerns.We further conduct multiple regressions to examine how career concerns influence risk-taking behaviors at a later stage. Empirical results suggest that postrisk-taking and the square of the probability of the negative career situation are positively correlated.This finding indicates that a U shaped relation between probability of fund managers' unfavorable circumstances and later risk-taking exists.Therefore,employees with high or low probability of negative occupation status will be risk-takers in the following period.Specifically,under the great pressure of losing job,the former kind of employees may take a higher risk with the hope of earning back their loss.Meanwhile,by taking the advantage of previous performance the latter kind of employees will be motivated to choose strategies with high-risk and high-reward in order to maintain their positions.Moreover,those who hold medium probability will take relatively conservative strategies. A robust test is taken by directly reviewing the relations between the previous performance ranking and laterrisk-taking as the performance measurement can avoid triggering changes to fund managers' working conditions.The results also show a positive correlation between the square of prior performance rankings and subsequent strategy takings.This finding implies some disagreements with the tournament theory.Both higher and lower ranking fund managers would take high risks in the end.We also discover significantly negative coefficients of the cross-term of working experiences and previous performance ranking in the beginning period.The less experienced a fund manager has,the clearer the U shaped relation between previous ranking and risk taking exists.