Classifying Executive Incentives:Hidden Actions,Effort Cost and Risk Aversion

Xie Deren
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2007.04.006
2007-01-01
Abstract:This paper will provide some explanations for the exist-ing mixed empirical evidence regarding the relationship between executive incentives and firm risk from the viewpoint of classifying executive incentives.The study is based on the standard principal-agent model with a more actual assumption that executives are able to influence or control firm idiosyncratic risk,which relaxes and substitutes the assumption that firm risk is totally independent of executive actions.Through examining the effects of hidden actions,effort cost and risk aversion on executive incentives,the authors of this article clearly classify executive incentives into such two types as Effort-enhancing Incentive(β effort Incentive)and Risk-seeking Incentive(β risk Incentive).In order to provide theβ effort Incentive,it is enough that executive compensation is the linear function of firm performance,which will show the positive relationship between executive compensation and firm performance,and the negative relationship between executive incentives and firm risk.However,to provide theβ risk incentive,executive compensation should be the convex function of firm performance,which will show the positive relationship between executive compensation and firm performance,and the positive relationship between executive incentives and firm risk.In detail,theβ effort incentive is negatively related to both firm systematic risk and firm idiosyncratic risk,but theβ risk incentive is positively related to firm idiosyncratic risk if the executive incen-tive's wealth effect is bigger than its risk-aversion effect.The au-thors believe that their classifying of executive incentives can help to exploit the general equilibrium relationship between executive incentives and firm risk,and future researches based on the above incentive classification will be important improvements in the field.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?