Abstract:Background Recent multicenter, multivendor MRI‐based R2* vs. liver iron concentration (LIC) calibrations (i.e., MCMV calibrations) may facilitate broad clinical dissemination of R2*‐based LIC quantification. However, these calibrations are based on a centralized offline R2* reconstruction, and their applicability with vendor‐provided R2* maps is unclear. Purpose To determine R2* ranges of agreement between the centralized and three MRI vendors' R2* reconstructions. Study Type Prospective. Subjects Two hundred and seven subjects (mean age 37.6 ± 19.6 years; 117 male) with known or suspected iron overload from four academic medical centers. Field Strength/Sequence Standardized multiecho spoiled gradient echo sequence at 1.5 T and 3.0 T for R2* mapping and a multiple spin‐echo sequence at 1.5 T for LIC quantification. MRI vendors: GE Healthcare, Philips Healthcare, and Siemens Healthineers. Assessment R2* maps were generated using both the centralized and vendor reconstructions, and ranges of agreement were determined. R2*‐LIC linear calibrations were determined for each site, field strength, and reconstruction and compared with the MCMV calibrations. Statistical Tests Bland–Altman analysis to determine ranges of agreement. Linear regression, analysis of covariance F tests, and Tukey's multiple comparison testing to assess reproducibility of calibrations across sites and vendors. A P value <0.05 was considered significant. Results The upper limits of R2* ranges of agreement were approximately 500, 375, and 330 s−1 for GE, Philips, and Siemens reconstructions, respectively, at 1.5 T and approximately 700 and 800 s−1 for GE and Philips, respectively, at 3.0 T. Within the R2* ranges of agreement, vendor R2*‐LIC calibrations demonstrated high reproducibility (no significant differences between slopes or intercepts; P ≥ 0.06) and agreed with the MCMV calibrations (overlapping 95% confidence intervals). Data Conclusion Based on the determined upper limits, R2* measurements obtained from vendor‐provided R2* maps may be reliably and practically used to quantify LIC less than approximately 8–13 mg/g using the MCMV calibrations and similar acquisition parameters as this study. Evidence Level 1 Technical Efficacy Stage 3

Imaging Core Lab Comparison of Five Clinical Liver Iron Mri Methods and Biopsy for Hepatic Iron Concentration (hic) in Sickle Cell Disease (scd) Patients.

Evaluation Of Brain Iron Content Based On Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Mri): Comparison Among Phase Value, R2*And Magnitude Signal Intensity

Histological Scores Validate the Accuracy of Hepatic Iron Load Measured by Signal Intensity Ratio and R2* Relaxometry MRI in Dialysis Patients

Magnetic Resonance Assessment Of Iron Overload By Separate Measurement Of Tissue Ferritin And Hemosiderin Iron

Noninvasive MRI-Based Liver Iron Quantification: Methodic Approaches, Practical Applicability and Significance

Digital Hepatic Iron Content: An Artificial Intelligence Model for Spatially Resolved Histologic Iron Quantitative Analysis in Liver Samples

Comparative Study on Iron Content Detection by Energy Spectral CT and MRI in MDS Patients.

Magnetic resonance detection of kidney iron deposition in sickle cell disease: A marker of chronic hemolysis

Evaluation of Liver Iron Content Using Synchrotron Radiation CT in Iron-Overload Mice

Liver Iron Quantification with MR Imaging: A Primer for Radiologists

Characteristic findings of the liver iron overload on MRI and the feasibility of quantitative evaluation by IDEALGIQ

Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Liver Iron Overload: From Precise Quantification to Prognosis Assessment

An In Vitro And In Vivo Analysis Of The Correlation Between Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging Phase Values And R2*In Cirrhotic Livers

Dual-Energy CT for Patients Suspected of Having Liver Iron Overload: Can Virtual Iron Content Imaging Accurately Quantify Liver Iron Content?

Practical Application of Multivendor MRI‐Based R2* Mapping for Liver Iron Quantification at 1.5 T and 3.0 T

Assessing the accuracy of CMRtools software for diagnosing liver iron overload in thalassemia patients: influencing factors and optimisation strategies

Repeatability and reproducibility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the liver

Improving Detection of Iron Deposition in Cirrhotic Liver Using Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging With Emphasis on Histopathological Correlation.

Can Automated 3-Dimensional Dixon-Based Methods Be Used in Patients With Liver Iron Overload?

MRI for Assessment of Iron Overload in Patients with Hematologic Disease

Quantification of Liver Iron Overload: Correlation of MRI and Liver Tissue Biopsy in Pediatric Thalassemia Major Patients Undergoing Bone Marrow Transplant