Maintenance Treatment of Uracil and Tegafur (UFT) in Responders Following First-Line Fluorouracil-Based Chemotherapy in Metastatic Gastric Cancer: a Randomized Phase II Study

Wenhua Li,Xiaoying Zhao,Huijie Wang,Xin Liu,Xinmin Zhao,Mingzhu Huang,Lixin Qiu,Wen Zhang,Zhiyu Chen,Weijian Guo,Jin Li,Xiaodong Zhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13922
2016-01-01
Oncotarget
Abstract:Background Maintenance therapy proves to be effective in advanced lung and breast cancer after initial chemotherapy. The purpose of this phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Uracil and Tegafur (UFT) maintenance in metastatic gastric cancer patients following the first-line fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Methods Metastatic gastric cancer patients with stable disease or a better response after the completion of first-line chemotherapy were randomized to oral UFT (360mg/m2 × 2 weeks) every 3 weeks until disease progression/intolerable toxicity or to observation (OBS). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and safety. Results The trial was closed after the interim analysis of the 58 enrolled (120 planned) patients. Median PFS was not improved in the UFT group compared with the OBS group (3.2 months versus 3.6 months, P = 0.752), as well as the median OS (14.2 months for both, P = 0.983). However, subgroup analysis showed that low baseline hemoglobin (< 120 g/L) was associated with poorer PFS with maintenance therapy (P = 0.032), while the normal hemoglobin patients benefit from the UFT treatment (P = 0.008). Grade 3 to 4 toxicities in the UFT group were anemia (3.4%), thrombocytopenia (3.4%) and diarrhea (6.9%). Conclusions This trial did not show superiority of UFT maintenance in non-selected patients responding to fluorouracil-based first-line chemotherapy. The normal hemoglobin level at baseline is a predictive biomarker for favorable patient subsets from the maintenance treatment.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?