Educational disparities in the intention to quit smoking among male smokers in China: a cross-sectional survey on the explanations provided by the theory of planned behaviour

Mariël Droomers,Xinyuan Huang,Wenjie Fu,Yong Yang,Hong Li,Pinpin Zheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011058
IF: 3.006
2016-01-01
BMJ Open
Abstract:Objectives: We aim to describe the intention to quit smoking among Chinese male smokers from different educational backgrounds and to explain this intention from their attitude, perceived social norms and self-efficacy regarding smoking cessation. Setting: Participants were recruited from workplaces and communities to reflect the occupational distribution in three cities (Shanghai, Nanning and Mudanjiang) in China. Design and participants: In 2013 interviews were conducted with 3676 male smokers aged 18 years and older. Outcome measures: Multivariate logistic regression analyses calculated educational differences in the intention to quit smoking as well as the association between the intention to quit smoking and attitude, subjective norms, and self-efficacy. Bootstrapping estimated to what extent the educational disparities in the intention to quit smoking were mediated by these three determinants. Results: No educational disparities in the intention to quit smoking within 1 or 6 months were observed among male Chinese smokers (p=0.623 and p=0.153, respectively). A less negative attitude, a higher perceived subjective norm towards smoking cessation, and a higher perceived self-efficacy to quit smoking were all associated with intention to quit (all p values < 0.001). Perceived subjective norms were the only component of the theory of planned behaviour that statistically significantly mediated the differences in the intention to quit smoking (within 1 or 6 months) between the lowest educated Chinese men and the groups with lower (beta=0.039, 95% CI 0.017 to 0.071 and beta=0.043, 95% CI 0.019 to 0.073), higher (beta=0.041, 95% CI 0.017 to 0.075 and beta=0.045, 95% CI 0.019 to 0.077) and the highest education (beta=0.045, 95% CI 0.019 to 0.080 and beta=0.050, 95% CI 0.023 to 0.083). Conclusions: In order to prevent future socioeconomic disparities in smoking cessation, investment in a more stimulating social environment and norms towards smoking cessation among particularly the lowest educated Chinese men is warranted.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?