SU‐F‐T‐53: Treatment Planning with Inhomogeneity Correction for Intraoperative Radiotherapy Using KV X‐Ray Beams

Y. Chen,M. Ghaly,S. Souri,L. Wang,F. Diaz,Y. Cao,E. Klein,A. Jamshidi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4956188
IF: 4.506
2016-01-01
Medical Physics
Abstract:Purpose:The current standard in dose calculation for intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) using the ZEISS Intrabeam 50 kV x‐ray system is based on depth dose measurements in water and no heterogeneous tissue effect has been taken into account. We propose an algorithm for pre‐treatment planning including inhomogeneity correction based on data of depth dose measurements in various tissue phantoms for kV x‐rays.Methods:Direct depth dose measurements were made in air, water, inner bone and cortical bone phantoms for the Intrabeam 50 kV x‐rays with a needle applicator. The data were modelled by a function of power law combining exponential with different parameters. Those phantom slabs used in the measurements were scanned to obtain CT numbers. The x‐ray beam initiated from the source isocenter is ray‐traced through tissues. The corresponding doses will be deposited/assigned at different depths. On the boundary of tissue/organ changes, the x‐ray beam will be re‐traced in new tissue/organ starting at an equivalent depth with the same dose. In principle, a volumetric dose distribution can be generated if enough directional beams are traced. In practice, a several typical rays traced may be adequate in providing estimates of maximum dose to the organ at risk and minimum dose in the target volume.Results:Depth dose measurements and modeling are shown in Figure 1. The dose versus CT number is shown in Figure 2. A computer program has been written for Kypho‐IORT planning using those data. A direct measurement through 2 mm solid water, 2 mm inner bone, and 1 mm solid water yields a dose rate of 7.7 Gy/min. Our calculation shows 8.1±0.4 Gy/min, consistent with the measurement within 5%.Conclusion:The proposed method can be used to more accurately calculate the dose by taking into account the heterogeneous effect. The further validation includes comparison with Monte Carlo simulation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?